Conditionality and Ownership in IMF Lending: A Political Economy Approach
By Allan Drazen. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 2002
258 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The relation between IMF conditionality and country ownership of assistance programs is considered from a political economy perspective, focusing on the question of why conditionality is needed if it is in a country's best interests to undertake the reform program. It is argued that heterogeneity of interests must form the basis of any discussion of conditionality and ownership. The paper stresses a conflict between a reformist government and domestic interest groups that oppose reform, leading to a distinction between government and country ownership of a program. After discussing conceptual issues, I present a model of lending and policy reform that illustrates the effects of unconditional and conditional assistance first without and then with political constraints. It is shown that conditionality can play a key role even when the IMF and authorities agree on the goals of an assistance program.
Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1510002a3b528b9f39b60674f6b27058d8cd9455
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
In Economics and Econometrics
- G. Garrett
- Stephan Haggard
- Beth A. Simmons
- F. Dobbin
- M. Noland
- R. Stone
- S. Rickard
- Kevin Featherstone
In Political Science and International Relations
- R. Stone
- G. Garrett
- Stephan Haggard
- Beth A. Simmons
- F. Dobbin
- M. Noland
- S. Rickard
- Kevin Featherstone
Citations in the corpus
- The Scope of IMF Conditionality (2008, background): “…with lower GDP growth rates, Przeworski and Vreeland 2000 inferred that lending is conditioned on inappropriate policy measures+ 36+ Khan and Sharma 2001; and Drazen 2002 call for greater ownership; IMF 2005 introduced the initiative to streamline conditionality+ Even studies showing beneficial…”
- WHICH VARIABLES EXPLAIN DECISIONS ON IMF CREDIT? AN EXTREME BOUNDS ANALYSIS (2005, unknown): “The results for this variable vary from negative [Dreher and Vaubel (2004)], no effect [e.”
- International Negotiations and Domestic Politics: The Case of IMF Labor Market Conditionality (2012, background): “…the IMF+ Putnam 1988 also argues that an IMF program can tip the balance in favor of economic reform+ 36+ Vreeland 2003, 63– 64+ 37+ IMF 2001+ 38+ See Drazen 2002; Boughton and Mourmouras 2004; and Ivanova et al+ 2006+ 39+ IMF 2001+ These considerations lead to the following hypotheses:”
- The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition or Learning? (2007, background): “Drazen (2002) argues that when a government faces political opposition to policies that are in the nation’s ultimate self-interest, it may be happy to have those policies imposed by outsiders.”
- Famine in North Korea : markets, aid, and reform (2007, background): “Drazen (2002) provides a theoretical model of this interaction, which centers on the concept of “ownership.””
- External conditionality and the debt crisis: the ‘Troika’ and public administration reform in Greece (2015, background): “As in other, international cases of external intervention, the sense of ‘ownership’ has been a key, intervening variable determining outcomes (Drazen 2002; Haughton 2007).”