Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals

By A. Guz, J. Rushchitsky. 2009

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14dacb291478ce3d0294a3263b9c26352603d9c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. Ali H. Al-Hoorie

Citations in the corpus

• The seven sins of L2 research: A review of 30 journals’ statistical quality and their CiteScore, SJR, SNIP, JCR Impact Factors (2019, background): “Intense competition exists between these two indexing services, resulting in continuous improvement of their metrics (see Chadegani et al., 2013; Guz & Rushchitsky, 2009).”
• Defining tipping points for social-ecological systems scholarship—an interdisciplinary literature review (2018, background): “…its more narrow coverage 12 We excluded existing records for 2017 because the number of publications entered into the database for this year was necessarily incomplete at the time of the analysis. of journals (Guz and Rushchitsky 2009) due to its stronger historical records (Chadegani et al 2013).”
• A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013, unknown): “IF is calculated according to the citations of all articles published in the journal during two years (Guz & Rushchitsky 2009).”