Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth.

By C. Judd, Laurie James-Hawkins, V. Yzerbyt, Yoshihisa Kashima. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005

1,040 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Impact of Candidate Appearance and Advertising Strategies on Election Results (2011, background): “Each of these dimensions has a positive and negative side (Asch 1946; Judd et al. 2005; Rosenberg, Nelson, and Vivekanathan 1968).”
Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. (2007, background): “Whereas Judd et al. (2005) were concerned with how the two dimensions are related to each other and Fiske et al. (2002) were concerned with how they relate to stereotypes of different groups, we are concerned here with how they are related to the basic characteristics of social cognition and social…”
Life's recurring challenges and the fundamental dimensions: An integration and its implications for cultural differences and similarities (2008, result): “Part of the present analysis builds on the work of many other investigators conducting research in many different areas across decades (for reviews see Abele & Wojciszke, 2007; Fiske et al., 2007; Judd et al., 2005; Ybarra et al., 2001).”
A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. (2010, neutral): “others (for a review, see Judd, James-Hawkins, Yzerbyt, & Kashima, 2005 ).”