Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems

By M. Price. 2003

2,276 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1467f36f8f76dcdf925b0d0d65760729f4c4d88f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Equity, Power Games, and Legitimacy: Dilemmas of Participatory Natural Resource Management (2013, background): “Key Words: critical systems; inequity; participatory approach; power; reflexivity; transdisciplinarity”
What Might We Say about a Circular Economy? Some Temptations to Avoid if Possible (2013, background): “But, as Gunderson and Holling (2001), the authors of the book Panarchy describe it, this image helps make sense of what had seemed an oxymoron: “sustainable” development.”
Research, part of a Special Feature on Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Cultural Landscapes: Analysis and Management Options Ecosystem Services are Social-ecological Services in a Traditional Pastoral System: the Case of California's Mediterranean Rangelands (2014, background): “Panarchy theory envisions each scale as a complex, adaptive system (Holling 2001, Gunderson and Holling 2002).”
The Politics of Reflexive Governance: Challenges for Designing Adaptive Management and Transition Management (2011, background): “It rests on a set of distinct ontological assumptions condensed in “panarchy” (Gunderson and Holling 2002, Holling 2001), a general theory about the dynamics of complex social–ecological systems.”
Anticipatory Governance (2010, background): “…change or reorganize while retaining essential functions, has emerged in the literature as vital to the long-term sustainability of social-ecological systems (Folke et al., 2002; Gunderson & Holling, 2002; Lambin, 2005; Voss, Bauknecht, & Kemp, 2006; Walker, Holling, Carpenter, & Kinzig, 2004).”
Social–ecological systems and adaptive governance of the commons (2006, background): “…(1992) has been very influential in this context, and new insights are emerging on cross-scale interactions in social–ecological systems (e.g. Gunderson and Holling 2002; Young 2000; Brown 2003; Anderies et al. 2004; Carpenter and Brock 2004; Cash et al. 2006), including dynamics of social…”
The Attention System of the Human Brain: 20 Years After (2012, background): “The study of many complex systems, from ecosystems to protein-protein interactions, seems to indicate that these systems follow a “rule of hand” and have approximately five controlling variables (ranging from three to seven) (Gunderson & Holling 2002).”
A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. (2008, background): “Complex biological and social systems are often driven by several separate control mechanisms with distinct functional properties [1].”
Game-Theoretic Methods for Robustness, Security, and Resilience of Cyberphysical Control Systems: Games-in-Games Principle for Optimal Cross-Layer Resilient Control Systems (2015, background): “Resilience has been studied in many fields such as psychology [5], ecology [6], and organizational behavior [7].”
Social Capital: A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Sustainable Community Development? (2010, background): “Others have argued that the failure to implement sustainable development is primarily a social issue, resulting from our failure to learn from our boom and bust cycles of development (Norgaard, 1994; Wackernagel and Rees, 1996; Dale, 2001; Gunderson and Holling, 2002).”
Livelihood strategies, resilience and transformability in African agroecosystems (2014, methodology): “Often the shifts, crises, or non-linearities observed in ecological systems result from processes and structures interacting across scales (Gunderson and Holling, 2002).”
The adaptive life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems: the biotechnology cluster (2017, methodology): “…of entrepreneurial ecosystem analysis that is both grounded in the theory of evolutionary economics (Nelson and Winter 1982) and informed by ecological theories of life cycle dynamics in natural and social systems (Bengtsson, Nilsson, Franc, and Menozzidi 2000; Holling and Gunderson 2002).”
Setting Effective and Realistic Restoration Goals: Key Directions for Research (2007, background): “…for increased interplay between theoretical and applied ecology has been increasingly recognized in recent years (Lawton 1996; Hobbs & Harris 2001), as has the need for increased interaction between the natural and social sciences to address complex environmental issues (Gunderson & Holling 2002).”
Ecological risk to aquatic systems from salinity increases (2003, background): “species richness)—the higher the diversity of a system, the more ecologically stable it is and the greater the resilience (Peterson et al. 1998; Gunderson and Holling 2002).”
Resilience Management in Social-ecological Systems: a Working Hypothesis for a Participatory Approach (2002, methodology): “As a metaphor to guide the case studies, we employ the adaptive cycle (Holling 1986, Gunderson and Holling 2002).”