Some alien birds have as severe an impact as the most effectual alien mammals in Europe.
By S. Kumschick, Wolfgang Nentwig. 2010
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14399c4e6057352a9305fd3330ec6c2c4d47cfcc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Insect Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Application of the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) to a global assessment of alien bird impacts (2016, background): “Kumschick & Nentwig (2010) examined the impacts of alien birds in Europe, and found Anseriformes and Psittaciformes (parrots) to generally be associated with more severe impacts, whilst Martin-Albarracin et al. (2015) found Anatidae (Anseriformes) to have the highest impacts globally.”
- Troubling travellers: are ecologically harmful alien species associated with particular introduction pathways? (2017, unknown): “ 2010, 2016, Kumschick and Nentwig 2011, Kenis et al.”
- Framework and guidelines for implementing the proposed IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) (2015, background): “The same alien taxon may also have impacts on human societies and economies [13], but these are not considered here.”
- A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts (2014, background): “The same alien species may also have impacts on human societies and economies [37], but these represent additional and complex dimensions of impacts [51–56], and one should avoid conflating environmental with non-environmental impacts.”
- A global assessment of alien amphibian impacts in a formal framework (2016, methodology): “To date, this latter scoring system has assessed species alien to Europe for mammals, birds, freshwater fish (some) invertebrates and plants (Kumschick & Nentwig, 2010; Nentwig et al., 2010; Kumschick et al., 2015a), and birds alien to Australia (Evans et al., 2014).”
- European Alien Species Information Network (EASIN): supporting European policies and scientific research (2015, background): “Europe is severely affected by biological invasions, which impact biodiversity, ecosystem services, economy and human health (Kettunen et al. 2009; Shine et al. 2010; Vilà et al. 2010; Kumschick and Nentwig 2010; Roques 2011; Vaes-Petignat and Nentwig 2014; Katsanevakis et al. 2014a).”
- Species‐based risk assessments for biological invasions: advances and challenges (2013, unknown): “To prevent such problems, impact-scoring systems have been developed in an attempt to standardize impact assessment (e.g. Kumschick & Nentwig, 2010; Kumschick et al., 2012).”
- An inventory of invasive alien species in China (2012, methodology): “Since then progress has been made in scoring the overall negative effects of alien species (e.g., Nentwig et al. 2010, Kumschick and Nentwig 2010, Pluess 2011).”
- Invasive species in Europe: ecology, status, and policy (2011, background): “Economic effects include impacts on human infrastructure, human health, human social life, livestock, plant production, and forestry [7,100,101].”
- Comparing impacts of alien plants and animals in Europe using a standard scoring system (2015, methodology): “Literature used for scoring can be found in Nentwig, K€uhnel & Bacher (2010), Kumschick & Nentwig (2010), Kumschick et al. (2011), Vaes-Petignat & Nentwig (2014) and Van der Veer & Nentwig (2014) or be obtained from the authors for plants (Z. Markov a, M. Vil a, J. Pergl, W. Nentwig & P. Py sek,…”