A global assessment of alien amphibian impacts in a formal framework
By G. Measey, G. Vimercati, F. A. D. Villiers, Mohlamatsane M. Mokhatla, S. Davies, Corey J. Thorp, A. Rebelo, S. Kumschick. 2016
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de6c764b2be4722c9c90081d65bc45e3e96a0329
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- D. Richardson
- Petr Pyšek
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
- M. Vilà
- S. Kumschick
- S. Bacher
- T. Blackburn
- John R. U. Wilson
In Global and Planetary Change
- Petr Pyšek
- John R. U. Wilson
- S. Bacher
- M. Vilà
- D. Richardson
- A. Melotto
- Reuben P. Keller
- Christoph Kueffer
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- Jan Pergl
- M. Vilà
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
- John R. U. Wilson
- S. Bacher
- S. Kumschick
Citations in the corpus
- The importance of assessing positive and beneficial impacts of alien species (2020, background): “The application of these frameworks to different taxa and ecosystems has allowed for the investigation of factors driving impact magnitude (e.g., Kumschick et al. 2013; Measey et al. 2016; Novoa et al. 2016; Evans et al. 2018) and the ranking of hundreds of alien species based on their deleterious i”
- Socio‐economic impact classification of alien taxa (SEICAT) (2018, methodology): “To illustrate the applicability and usefulness of SEICAT, we assessed all alien amphibians globally (104 species; Measey et al. 2016).”
- Invasive Species and Amphibian Conservation (2020, background): “They may also be vectors of diseases, so American Bullfrogs may alter environmental processes in complex ways (D’Amore 2012; Measey et al. 2016).”