Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: a New Approach

By A. José, Alonso, Teresa Mª, Lamata. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst., 2006

886 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13f1b74fb9cb5764e399cf213a01274ade280d06

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

1. Alessio Ishizaka
2. Gang Kou

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. J. Franěk
2. Ales Kresta
3. Alessio Ishizaka
4. Ashraf Labib
5. Gang Kou
6. Changsheng Lin
7. Jafar Rezaei
8. Majid Mohammadi

Citations in the corpus

• Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations (2009, background): “Alonso and Lamata (2006)”
• A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP (2014, background): “…a PCM; Aguarón and Moreno-Jiménez (2003) proposed the geometric consistency index (GCI) and provided the approximated thresholds associated with it; Alonso and Lamata (2006) proposed a transformation formulation of consistency thresholds by a regression of the random indices; Stein and Mizzi…”
• Judgment Scales and Consistency Measure in AHP (2014, background): “In recent study from Alonso and Lamata (2006) the number of simulation ranged from 100 000 to 500 000.”
• Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process (2011, background): “…0.58 0.9 1.12 1.24 1.32 1.41 1.45 1.49 Table 3: Random indices from (T. Saaty, 1977) Other researchers have run simulations with different numbers of matrices (Aguarón & Moreno-Jiménez, 2003; Alonso & Lamata, 2006; Lane & Verdini, 1989; Tummala & Wan, 1994) or incomplete matrices (E. Forman, 1990).”