Impact of non‐indigenous species on natives enhanced by anthropogenic alteration of selection regimes

By J. E. Byers. 2002

493 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13d34642d68a4cabf7eabb60d46c917b8a703aae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Predation contributes to invasion resistance of benthic communities against the non-indigenous tunicate Ciona intestinalis (2011, methodology): “Our model integrates the selection regime modification ( Byers 2002b ) suggesting that disturbance events (e.g., overfishing, pollution or periodic variation in climate conditions such as El Nin ˜o Southern Oscillation, ENSO), which may reduce natural predation and competition pressure, could rapidl”
The Potential Conservation Value of Non‐Native Species (2011, background): “Indeed, some non-native species may be preadapted or adapt rapidly to the novel ecological conditions (Byers 2002).”
Can more K‐selected species be better invaders? A case study of fruit flies in La Réunion (2007, background): “However, not all invasions happen in such contexts (Byers, 2002; Daehler, 2003; Evans, 2004).”
Fish fauna destruction after the introduction of a non-native predator (Cichla kelberi) in a Neotropical reservoir (2009, background): “Some authors have discussed that colonization and impacts caused by non-native species emerge from complex processes, usually in association with other environmental disturbances (Moyle and Light 1996; Byers 2002; Shea and Chesson 2002).”
In search of a real definition of the biological invasion phenomenon itself (2008, background): “, eutrophication, loss/addition of top predators, fire/change in fire regime) that changes the competition regime through the redistribution of the selective forces at work (Byers 2002).”
Do artificial substrates favor nonindigenous fouling species over native species (2007, background): “These disturbances, if outside the magnitude, duration, or frequency of natural disturbances that affect communities, can create a mismatch between traits of the native species and the environmental conditions to which they have long adapted—a phenomenon termed selection regime modification (SRM) ( ”
Global meta‐analysis of the impacts of terrestrial invertebrate invaders on species, communities and ecosystems (2016, background): “Disturbances that remove native species or shift habitat conditions away from those to which the native community is adapted may lead to larger impacts of invaders that lose native competitors (Byers, 2002; Lockwood et al., 2013).”
Five Potential Consequences of Climate Change for Invasive Species (2008, background): “Because climate change is expected to shift native species out of the conditions to which they are adapted, competitive resistance from native species may lessen (Byers 2002).”
Invasive alien plant species in China: regional distribution patterns (2005, background): “The dispersal of many invasive plant species depends on the activity of humans and some exotic propagules and may require human disturbances to become established (Py Í ek et al ., 1998; Byers, 2002; Corbin & D’Antonio, 2004).”
Plant invasions and the niche (2009, unknown): “Similarly, eutrophication and alteration of the trophic structure in a community, both commonly caused by anthropogenic disturbance, can favour invaders (Byers 2002).”
The role of behavior in the success of invasive crustaceans (2010, background): “It has been suggested that anthropogenic disturbance, such as eutrophication and the selective removal of top predators by overfishing, can change the environment so that selection regimes are altered and the native species can lose its prior advantage (Byers 2002).”