Plant invasions and the niche

By A. MacDougall, B. Gilbert, J. Levine. 2009

464 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ca1b2af538a5cc062c2f9a1e485623967787b19

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species (2013, background): “…can be extended further to contrast niche and fitness differences between natives and nonnatives, with the idea that niche differences should increase coexistence, whereas fitness differences should lead to negative impacts and potential exclusion (Melbourne et al. 2007, MacDougall et al. 2009).”
Are urban systems beneficial, detrimental, or indifferent for biological invasion? (2017, background): “…most similar to native species compete the most and have the greatest impact on native abundance and diversity (Funk et al. 2008; Li et al. 2015; MacDougall et al. 2009; Pokorny et al. 2005), though this is not universally true since a distantly related NIS might possess a unique suite of…”
The Ecology and Evolution of Alien Plants (2018, unknown): “This modern coexistence theory has only recently been extended to biological invasions and linked to Darwin’s Naturalization naturalization Conundrum conundrum (MacDougall et al. 2009, Thuiller et al. 2010).”
Management of invasive plants through ecological resistance (2017, background): “…invasion resistance and related ecological concepts Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how biotic resistance, abiotic constraints, and propagule pressure each acts during invasion (Fridley et al. 2007; Funk et al. 2008; MacDougall et al. 2009; Sax et al. 2007; Shea and Chesson 2002).”
The imbalance of nature: revisiting a Darwinian framework for invasion biology (2014, background): “…placed within a modern species interaction framework where competitive outcomes are the result of Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23, 1157–1166, © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 1159 both niche and fitness differences between species (Chesson, 2000; Stachowicz & Tilman, 2005; MacDougall et al., 2009).”
The relationship between invader abundance and impact (2018, background): “However, establishment of an invader does not imply strong impacts, which in coexistence theory are instead associated with niche similarity combined with a fitness advantage that allows the invader to increase in abundance (MacDougall et al. 2009).”
Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence (2010, background): “, 2008) and to integrate theoretical understanding of neutral dynamics and niche-based dynamics (Chesson, 2000; Macdougall et al., 2009) when formulating predictions.”
Mechanisms of Plant Invasions of North American and European Grasslands (2011, background): “MacDougall et al. (2009) modified coexistence models to show how fitness and niche differences can control the outcome of invasions.”
Litter legacy increases the competitive advantage of invasive Phragmites australis in New England wetlands (2011, background): “ecology (Seabloom et al. 2003; Levine et al. 2003 and 2006; MacDougall et al. 2009 ).”