Learning about danger: chemical alarm cues and local risk assessment in prey fishes
By Grant E. Brown. 2003
433 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13c5b8b5115869662d76423c3c9f5cd5f1f827a2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- M. Ferrari
- D. Chivers
- Grant E. Brown
- B. Wisenden
- Kristen J. Epp
- C. Gabor
- Mark I. McCormick
- S. Vilhunen
In Global and Planetary Change
- M. Ferrari
- D. Chivers
- Grant E. Brown
- B. Wisenden
- S. Vilhunen
- Mark I. McCormick
- R. Manassa
- Kristen J. Epp
Citations in the corpus
- Learning threat-sensitive predator avoidance: how do fathead minnows incorporate conflicting information? (2006, background): “Chemical alarm cues are known to facilitate learned recognition of novel predators (reviewed in Brown 2003).”
- A short review of pike ecology (2008, neutral): “, 2005), olfactory (e.g. chemical; Brown, 2003) tactile and auditory detection”
- Predation risk assessment by olfactory and visual cues in a coral reef fish (2008, background): “Aquatic vertebrates can use a variety of information sources to assess predation risk, with the most commonly used cues being visual (Helfman 1989; Murphy and Pitcher 1997; Smith and Belk 2001) and chemical stimuli (Chivers and Smith 1998; Wisenden 2000; Brown 2003; Brown and Chivers 2006).”
- The role of learning in the development of threat-sensitive predator avoidance by fathead minnows (2005, background): “However, alarm cues are also known in salmonids, gobies, poeciliids, sticklebacks, percids, sculpins, cottids, cichlids and centrarchids (review Chivers & Smith 1998; Brown 2003).”
- Innate and Learned Predator Recognition Mediated by Chemical Signals in Eurycea nana (2008, background): “In general, studies indicate that fishes are more likely to learn which chemical stimuli are dangerous (Brown 2003; Kelley & Magurran 2003) while amphibians more often exhibit innate responses (Kats & Dill 1998).”
- Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. (2010, positive): “Similar ontogenetic switches occurred with pumpkinseed sunfish (Marcus and Brown 2003) and green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus Rafinesque, 1819) (Golub and Brown 2003).”
- Sociality increases juvenile survival after a catastrophic event in the feral horse (Equus caballus) (2015, background): “…M o n th s su rv iv ed M o n th s su rv iv ed R ) j i , i including insects (Chittka and Leadbeater 2005; Coolen et al. 2005), fish (Dugatkin 1992; Brown 2003), reptiles (Ballen et al. 2014), birds, (Galef Jr and White 1998; Freeberg 2000; Hunt and Gray 2003), and mammals (Cook and Mineka 1989;…”
- Less is more: social learning of predator recognition requires a low demonstrator to observer ratio in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) (2004, background): “: +358-9-19157728 2002; Brown 2003), such as training with live predators (Suboski and Templeton 1989; Brown and Smith 1998), predator-experienced individuals (Suboski 1988; Suboski et al. 1990; Kieffer and Colgan 1992; Kelley et al. 2003), or damage-induced alarm chemicals (Rehnberg and Schreck…”