Learning threat-sensitive predator avoidance: how do fathead minnows incorporate conflicting information?
By M. Ferrari, D. Chivers. 2006
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8dbfa7cda9108431d08f88050c48581c86dcec41
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- M. Ferrari
- D. Chivers
- Grant E. Brown
- F. Messier
- Alix C. Rive
- J. Godin
- C. Elvidge
- Camille J. Macnaughton
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Provenance and threat-sensitive predator avoidance patterns in wild-caught Trinidadian guppies (2009, background): “They reported that cichlids exposed to high versus low frequencies of predation risk still exhibited a non-graded response pattern, suggesting that threat-sensitive decisions are shaped by immediate factors (Vainikka et al. 2005; Brown et al. 2006b; Ferrari and Chivers 2006).”
- Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. (2010, unknown): “Ferrari and Chivers (2006b) found that when given several pieces of information regarding the level of threat associated with a predator, fathead minnows seem to have a ‘‘rule of thumb’’ to respond to risk: first, when given conflicting information, minnows respond conservatively by minimizing risk…”
- Temporal variability, threat sensitivity and conflicting information about the nature of risk: understanding the dynamics of tadpole antipredator behaviour (2009, unknown): “These results support the findings of Ferrari & Chivers (2006), who tested the effect of conflicting information on the ability of naı̈ve fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, to learn to recognize an unknown predator.”
- The dynamic nature of antipredator behavior: prey fish integrate threat-sensitive antipredator responses within background levels of predation risk (2006, background): “…variation in perceived predation risk does have an influence on overall response intensity and minimum behavioral response thresholds (current data), the overall pattern of the threat-sensitive decision is influenced by more immediate factors (Vainikka et al. 2005; Ferrari and Chivers 2006).”
- The nose knows: minnows determine predator proximity and density through detection of predator odours (2006, background): “Ferrari & Chivers (2006) showed that experience to different predation situations shaped the intensity of the fright responses displayed by fathead minnows.”
- Learning about Danger: Chemical Alarm Cues and Threat‐Sensitive Assessment of Predation Risk by Fishes (2011, background): “Ferrari & Chivers (2006a) tested whether recent experience shapes threat-sensitive learning.”
- Responses of American toad tadpoles to predation cues: behavioural response thresholds, threat-sensitivity and acquired predation recognition (2006, unknown): “Since this finding, numerous other investigators have examined the same phenomenon in fathead minnows (Wisenden & Harter, 2001; Ferrari et al., 2005; Ferrari & Chivers, 2006a ) and other fishes, including zebra danios (Brachydanio rerio: Suboski et al., 1990), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss: Br”