Inhibition of shrimp pathogenic vibrios by a marine Pseudomonas I-2 strain

By R. Chythanya, I. Karunasagar, I. Karunasagar. 2002

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Immunology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1372fe59015c6a9b73f9bc03371e478361a9c394

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. Jose L. Balcazar
2. A. Newaj-Fyzul
3. A. Al-Harbi
4. A. Panigrahi
5. B. Austin
6. S. Nayak
7. R. Moutafchieva
8. G. Beev

In Immunology

1. Jose L. Balcazar
2. I. Ruiz-Zarzuela
3. A. Newaj-Fyzul
4. A. Al-Harbi
5. A. Panigrahi
6. B. Austin
7. S. Nayak
8. E. Ringø

Citations in the corpus

• Microbial intervention for better fish health in aquaculture: the Indian scenario (2007, background): “Lactic acid bacteria (Gatesoupe 1994; Ajitha et al. 2004), Caronbacterium (Robertson et al. 2000), Bacillus (Gatesoupe 1991; Rengpipat et al. 1998; Vaseeharan and Ramasamy 2003), Vibrio (Austin et al. 1995 )a nd Pseudomonas ( Chythanya et al. 2002 ; V aseeharan et al. 2003; Vijayan et al. 2006) are ”
• Probiotics and competitive exclusion of pathogens in shrimp aquaculture (2020, background): “aeruginosa I-2, however, has been suggested to be attributed to a low molecular weight, non-proteinaceous antimicrobial compound, possibly pyocyanin (Chythanya et al., 2002), that is a well-described virulence factor associated with disease in patients with cystic fibrosis (Jeffries et al.”
• Probiotics in aquaculture: The need, principles and mechanisms of action and screening processes (2008, background): “In some cases, initial in vitro screening was followed by small scale testing of short-listed candidates in vivo for either pathogenicity to the host (Makridis et al., 2000; Chythanya et al., 2002; Hjelm et al., 2004a) or host protection when challenged with a pathogen (Rengpipat et al.”
• Screening of marine Streptomyces spp. for potential use as probiotics in aquaculture (2010, background): “Cross streak assay (Chythanya et al., 2002; Hai et al., 2007): As many as forty three actinomycetes strains were streaked about 0.”
• Review: Developments in the use of probiotics for disease control in aquaculture (2014, background): “Vibrio fluvialis, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus (Chythanya et al., 2002).”
• Probiotic effect of Bacillus NL110 and Vibrio NE17 on the survival, growth performance and immune response of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man) (2010, methodology): “Similar ¢ndings on probiotic strains were reported earlier (Chythanya et al. 2002; Vijayan, Bright Singh, Jayaprakash, Alavandi, Somnath Pai, Preetha, Rajan & Santiago 2006).”
• The role of probiotics in aquaculture. (2006, background): “A common way to select probiotics is to perform in vitro antagonism tests, in which pathogens are exposed to the candidate probiotics or their extracellular products in a liquid (Sotomayor and Balcázar, 2003; Vine et al., 2004a) or solid (Dopazo et al., 1988; Chythanya et al., 2002) medium.”