A General Theory of Entrepreneurship
By Scott A. Shane. 2003
1,981 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1366cd7725661f31fe3010885e96efe43d169975
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Mike Wright
- David B. Audretsch
- Johan Wiklund
- Per Davidsson
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Dirk De Clercq
- Karl J. Wennberg
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David B. Audretsch
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Johan Wiklund
- Per Davidsson
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Roy Thurik
- David Urbano
- Mike Wright
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Johan Wiklund
- Karl J. Wennberg
- Melissa S. Cardon
- Holger Patzelt
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Per Davidsson
- Keith M. Hmieleski
Citations in the corpus
- Social enterprise versus social entrepreneurship: An examination of the ‘why’ and ‘how’ in pursuing social change (2013, background): “The term ‘entrepreneurship’ is associated with opportunity identification, innovation and risk (Kirzner, 1979; Shane, 2003; Venkataraman and Sarasvathy, 2001), and the introduction of something new to the market (Davidsson, 2006).”
- Biology and Selection into Entrepreneurship—The Relevance of Prenatal Testosterone Exposure (2016, methodology): “Entrepreneurship research based on the individual–opportunity nexus framework, for instance, stresses that individual differences play a critical role in individuals’ decision-making processes (Eckhardt & Shane, 2010; Shane, 2003; Shane & Venkataraman, 2000; Venkataraman, 1997).”
- Serial entrepreneurship: impact of human capital on time to re-entry (2011, background): “In the same vein, individuals with managerial experience are more likely to have developed the necessary skills to pursue market opportunities and organize new businesses (Bates 1990; Gimeno et al. 1997; Eckhardt and Shane 2003).”
- The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship (2017, positive): “Like all forms of entrepreneurship, innovative entrepreneurship originates from a nexus of individuals and opportunities (Shane 2003).”
- The role of problem solving ability on innovative behavior and opportunity recognition in university students (2018, background): “Shane (2003) The ability to identify opportunities with new information, such as puzzles. learning process of new venture firms.”
- Competence development of entrepreneurs in innovative horticulture (2007, background): “Examples of outputs of opportunities are new products, new services, new markets, new inputs, new production methods and new methods of organization (Shane, 2003).”
- Knowledge context and entrepreneurial intentions among students (2012, background): “…make the difference in international competition are not those which are ubiquitously available but those which are bound to a specific location and cannot easily be replicated or imitated elsewhere (Storper 1997). quality, quantity and speed of receipt of that information’’ (Shane 2003, p. 49).”
- Toward a Theory of Public Entrepreneurship (2010, background): “A large literature on antecedents of entrepreneurial discovery (Shane & Venkataraman, 2000; Shane, 2003) focuses on how individuals perceive their environment, how they value factors and products, and how they communicate their discoveries to others.”
- The Small Firm Effect and the Entrepreneurial Spawning of Scientists and Engineers (2010, background): “The negative relationship between firm size and labor turnover is well documented (Brown, Hamilton, and Medoff 1990, Davis, Haltiwanger, and Schuh.”
- Planned Luck: How Incubators Can Facilitate Serendipity for Nascent Entrepreneurs Through Fostering Network Embeddedness (2020, background): “…from the network structure (Dushnitsky & Shaver, 2009; Zane & DeCarolis, 2016), such as access to tangible resources (e.g., financial resources; Batjargal et al., 2013), learning benefits (Powell et al., 1996), emotional support (Shane, 2003), and enhanced status and legitimacy (Burt, 1997).”