CHARACTERIZING THE COOL KOIs. III. KOI 961: A SMALL STAR WITH LARGE PROPER MOTION AND THREE SMALL PLANETS

By P. Muirhead, J. Johnson, K. Apps, J. Carter, Timothy Morton, D. Fabrycky, J. Pineda, M. Bottom, B. Rojas-Ayala, E. Schlawin and 14 more. 2012

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We characterize the star KOI 961, an M dwarf with transit signals indicative of three short-period exoplanets discovered by the Kepler mission. We proceed by comparing KOI 961 to Barnard's Star, a nearby, well-characterized mid-M dwarf. We compare colors, optical and near-infrared spectra, and find remarkable agreement between the two, implying similar effective temperatures and metallicities. Both are metal-poor compared to the Solar neighborhood, have low projected rotational velocity, high absolute radial velocity, large proper motion, and no quiescent Hα emission—all of which are consistent with being old M dwarfs. We combine empirical measurements of Barnard's Star and expectations from evolutionary isochrones to estimate KOI 961's mass (0.13 ± 0.05 M☉), radius (0.17 ± 0.04 R☉), and luminosity (2.40 × 10−3.0 ± 0.3 L☉). We calculate KOI 961's distance (38.7 ± 6.3 pc) and space motions, which, like Barnard's Star, are consistent with a high scale-height population in the Milky Way. We perform an independent multi-transit fit to the public Kepler light curve and significantly revise the transit parameters for the three planets. We calculate the false-positive probability for each planet candidate, and find a less than 1% chance that any one of the transiting signals is due to a background or hierarchical eclipsing binary, validating the planetary nature of the transits. The best-fitting radii for all three planets are less than 1 R⊕, with KOI 961.03 being Mars-sized (RP = 0.57 ± 0.18 R⊕), and they represent some of the smallest exoplanets detected to date.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/134dff9b1d1a6a7193fbbeca28b935961271d788

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Charbonneau
  2. Timothy Morton
  3. J. Johnson
  4. Jon Fortney
  5. J. Winn
  6. E. Gaidos
  7. G. Marcy
  8. Andrew W. Howard

In Instrumentation

  1. D. Charbonneau
  2. Timothy Morton
  3. J. Winn
  4. J. Johnson
  5. J. Southworth
  6. E. Gaidos
  7. Jon Fortney
  8. G. Marcy

Citations in the corpus