Two-month-old infants match phonetic information in lips and voice

By Michelle L. Patterson, Janet F. Werker. 2003

319 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Early Experience & Multisensory Perceptual Narrowing (2014, background): “For example, as early as 2 months of age, infants can match facially and vocally produced native speech syllables even when the audible syllable is synchronized with both visual syllables (Kuhl & Meltzoff, 1982; Patterson & Werker, 1999, 2002, 2003; Walton & Bower, 1993).”
Critical periods in speech perception: new directions. (2015, background): “…with two side-by-side images of the same woman’s face articulating “ee” and “ouu” respectively, infants of 4 months (Kuhl & Meltzoff 1982) and 2 months (Patterson & Werker 2003), and possibly even newborns (Aldridge et al. 1999), look longer to the side that is articulating the sound that they…”
Infants deploy selective attention to the mouth of a talking face when learning speech (2012, background): “because of fussiness or inattentiveness (33), failure to calibrate, which was either attributable to the infant being uncooperative or the eye tracker not being able to find the pupil (39), or equipment failure (4).”
Heterochrony and Cross-Species Intersensory Matching by Infant Vervet Monkeys (2009, result): “Other studies [6,27,28] have found that the longest”
Five-month-old infants' identification of the sources of vocalizations (2009, background): “A 2 (congruence: match, mismatch) 2 (block: first, second) ANOVA yielded a significant effect of congruence [F(2, 28) 7.”
Infant perception of audio-visual speech synchrony. (2010, background): “Several prior studies have shown that infants are able to match the auditory and visual attributes of speech even when A-V temporal synchrony cues are not available (Kuhl & Meltzoff, 1982, 1984; Patterson & Werker, 1999, 2002, 2003).”
A Bilingual Advantage in Visual Language Discrimination in Infancy (2012, unknown): “…see McGurk & McDonald, 1976; Soto-Faraco et al., 2007; regarding infants, see Kuhl & Meltzoff, 1982; Kushnerenko, Teinonen, Volein, & Csibra, 2008; Patterson & Werker, 2003; Pons, Lewkowicz, SotoFaraco, & Sebastián-Gallés, 2009; Vouloumanos, Druhen, Hauser, & Huizink, 2009; for a review, see…”
The decline of cross-species intersensory perception in human infants: underlying mechanisms and its developmental persistence. (2008, background): “These studies have all shown that the ability to integrate the audible and visible attributes of human talking faces does not decline (Kahana-Kalman and Walker-Andrews, 2001; Kuhl and Meltzoff, 1982; Patterson and Werker, 1999, 2002, 2003; Poulin-Dubois et al., 1998, 1994; Walker-Andrews, 1986; Wa”
Brief daily exposures to Asian females reverses perceptual narrowing for Asian faces in Caucasian infants (2012, unknown): “…is maintained only for socially relevant stimuli (e.g., human faces and vocalizations vs. monkey faces and vocalizations) (Bahrick, Netto, & Hernandez-Reif, 1998; Kuhl & Meltzoff, 1982; Lewkowicz & Ghazanfar, 2006; Patterson & Werker, 2003; Poulin-Dubois, Serbin, Kenyon, & Derbyshire, 1994).”
Intersensory Perception at Birth: Newborns Match Nonhuman Primate Faces and Voices. (2010, background): “…even though newborn infants can match simple facial and vocal speech gestures (Aldridge, Braga, Walton, & Bower, 1999; Kuhl & Meltzoff, 1982; Patterson & Werker, 1999, 2003; Sai, 2005), only older infants (6 months of age and older) can perceive amodal gender and affect and they can do that…”
Narrowing of intersensory speech perception in infancy (2009, result): “Comparison of the percentage of correct matches across these two groups indicated that the English-speaking adults’ matching scores were significantly higher than the Spanish-speaking adults’ scores [t (20) 6.”
Recognition of Amodal Language Identity Emerges in Infancy (2013, background): “Two months later, infants begin to detect amodal phonetic information inherent in single syllables (Kuhl & Meltzoff, 1982; Patterson & Werker, 1999, 2003) and by 3 months infants can associate specific people’s faces and voices (Brookes et al., 2001).”