Structure in plant–animal interaction assemblages

By Thomas Michael Lewinsohn, P. Prado, Pedro Jordano, Jordi Bascompte, J. Olesen. 2006

455 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/121ec23b799a5e863f86f93bd9acccba53fe643b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Identifying compartments in presence–absence matrices and bipartite networks: insights into modularity measures (2013, background): “Both compartmentalized and nested patterns have been shown to coexist in plant–pollinator, plant–herbivore and host–parasitoid networks (Lewinsohn et al., 2006; Olesen et al., 2007; Fortuna et al., 2010) and in various speciesoccurrence data sets (Hausdorf & Hennig, 2007; Carstensen & Olesen, 2009;…”
A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement (2008, background): “Actually, it also occurs with the number of departures (D) proposed by Lomolino (1996), with the metrics N0 (Patterson and Atmar 1986) and N1 (Cutler 1991), and with the measures based on unexpected absences and/or presences (Cutler 1991, Wright et al.”
Conservation of species interaction networks (2010, background): “In fact, antagonistic networks (such as predator–prey or plant-herbivore food webs) may be more compartmentalised (Lewinsohn et al., 2006; but see Thébault and Fontaine (2008)), though how this affects food web functional stability remains unclear.”
On nestedness in ecological networks (2010, background): “, 2002), plant–herbivore (Lewinsohn et al., 2006), plant–epiphyte, and tree–fungus (Vacher et al.”
Network properties of an epiphyte metacommunity (2007, methodology): “Leibold & Mikkelson’s (2002) technique yielded mixed support for compartmented interactions (sensu Lewinsohn et al. 2006).”
A comprehensive framework for the evaluation of metacommunity structure (2010, methodology): “4A) and was called compound structures (Lewinsohn et al. 2006); however, this concept can be extended to include any type of structure, not just those that are nested.”
Identifying Causes of Patterns in Ecological Networks: Opportunities and Limitations (2017, background): “In the words of Lewinsohn et al. (2006), “In highly diversified interaction assemblages of varying specificity . . . evolutionary processes and dynamics yielding complex patterns can be extremely difficult to decipher” (p. 182) (see also Figure 2).”
The Structure of Ecological Networks Across Levels of Organization (2020, background): “In contrast, for intimate interactions that form disconnected networks, interaction patterns usually show a strong association with phylogenetic patterns (Fonseca & Ganade 1996, Lewinsohn et al. 2006), suggesting that similar traits aremediating interactions in groups of closely related species.”
Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks (2008, methodology): “This sequence is determined, as suggested by (Lewinsohn et al., 2006), using correspondence analysis.”
Coextinction and persistence of dependent species in a changing world (2012, background): “Fundamental differences between mutualistic networks and trophic networks are under active exploration (Lewinsohn et al. 2006).”