Innovation Systems, Institutional Change And The New Knowledge Market: Implications For Third World Agricultural Development

By N. Clark. 2002

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11f0e6560d7d47fc2bb2951889a87d2cb1e20b67

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. L. Klerkx
2. C. Leeuwis
3. Sally Brooks
4. M. Loevinsohn
5. A. Hall
6. C. Kilelu
7. D. Spielman
8. M. Schut

In Economics and Econometrics

1. L. Klerkx
2. C. Leeuwis
3. Sally Brooks
4. M. Loevinsohn
5. D. Spielman
6. C. Kilelu
7. A. Hall
8. M. Schut

Citations in the corpus

• Taking Complexity in Food Systems Seriously: An Interdisciplinary Analysis (2014, background): “Lack of understanding of institutional contexts limits effectiveness of technical innovations (Clark, 2002).”
• Strengthening Agricultural Innovation Capacity: Are Innovation Brokers the Answer? (2009, background): “Although mentioned as a solution to innovation system fragmentation and underperformance, and researched in preliminary studies (Clark, 2002; Spielman & Von Grebmer, 2006; Hartwich, Gottret et al., 2007; Van Mele, 2008; World Bank, 2008; Kristjanson et al., 2009), the topic has been less…”
• Balancing multiple interests: embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure (2008, background): “In the agricultural literature, innovation intermediaries have been mentioned in prospective and preliminary studies as possible solutions to uncertainties resulting from the transformation to R&D and KIBS markets (Senker and Faulkner, 2001; Clark, 2002; Garforth et al., 2003; Sulaiman et al., 2005)”
• Rural innovation systems and networks: findings from a study of Ethiopian smallholders (2011, background): “It may originate from foreign sources of discovery or emerge from the use or reorganization of internal and indigenous practices and behaviors (Clark 2002; Malerba 2002).”
• Advances in Knowledge Brokering in the Agricultural Sector: Towards Innovation System Facilitation (2012, background): “With regard to the role of extensionists, there is a shift towards – or rather the emergence of – an additional and complementary role as systemic facilitator (Clark 2002; Millstone et al. 2010; Rivera and Sulaiman 2009).”
• From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research (2003, background): “The application of this concept of a national system of innovation framework in the agricultural research sector is gaining ground (Hall et al., 1998, 2000, 2001, 2002a,b; Rasheed Sulaiman and Hall, 2002; Mehra, 2000; Clark, 2002; Clarke et al., 2001; Ekboir and Parellada, 2001).”
• Shaping agricultural innovation systems responsive to food insecurity and climate change (2011, methodology): “More recently, this approach has been recommended as a framework more suited to the analysis of agricultural innovation than conventional, linear models that privilege formal R&D as the source of innovation (Hall 2007; Hall 2005; Clark 2002).”
• Innovation systems perspectives on developing-country agriculture: a critical review (2005, background): “Yet it may also emerge from the practices and behaviors of individuals, households, and civil society organizations (Clark, 2002).”
• Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries (2008, background): “With regard to the agricultural sector, innovation intermediaries have been mentioned as possible solutions to uncertainties resulting from the transfer to R&D and KIBS markets (Enzing et al., 1998; Senker and Faulkner, 2001; Clark, 2002; De Groot, 2003; Garforth et al., 2003; Sulaiman et al., 2005)”
• What do complex adaptive systems look like and what are the implications for innovation policy (2010, background): “Earlier work on general systems theory may be found in Emery (1970) and Koestler (1970) v See Clark (2002) for a detailed discussion of this and related points A second property of living systems is that their behaviour cannot really be understood solely by formal analysis of their component parts.”
• Beyond knowledge brokering: an exploratory study on innovation intermediaries in an evolving smallholder agricultural system in Kenya (2011, unknown): “In this context, the demand side denotes agricultural entrepreneurs, whereas the supply side features R&D and knowledge service providers (Clark 2002, Leeuwis and van den Ban 2004, Klerkx and Leeuwis 2008). These scholars view knowledge brokering as having the more sophisticated role of matching the”