Executive Compensation, Firm Performance and Chaebols in Korea: Evidence from New Panel Data

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Executive Compensation, Firm Performance, and Corporate Governance in China: Evidence from Firms Listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges (2006, unknown): “Using data from Kubo (2004) for Japan and Kato et al. (2006) for Korea, and the International Labour Organisation (ILO) average manufacturing worker wage, we found that the ratio of average executive pay to average manufacturing worker wage was 4.2 for Japan in 1995–96 and 5.6 for Korea in…”
Disproportional Ownership Structure and Pay-Performance Relationship: Evidence from China's Listed Firms (2011, result): “These pay levels were much lower than those reported in research for the U.S., U.K., and other countries (Brick et al., 2006; Merhebi et al., 2006; Kato et al., 2007; Basu et al., 2007).”
An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance with Moderating Effects of CEO Power and Ownership Structure: A Case Study of the Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan (2019, background): “All components of CEO compensation in Pakistan are required to be published in annual reports, but other Asian countries may not disclose this information properly [113–115].”