Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels
By B. Buunk, P. Dijkstra, Detlef Fetchenhauer, D. Kenrick. 2002
246 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11124cd84755b8123bc413b04ed0414aaed17d0d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- M. Haselton
- David A. Frederick
- D. Schmitt
- Justin R. Garcia
- Mark Schaller
- Daniel Nettle
- Damian R. Murray
- T. Shackelford
In Marketing
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Haselton
- D. Schmitt
- David A. Frederick
- Mark Schaller
- Damian R. Murray
- David M. Buss
- Daniel Nettle
- Steve Stewart-Williams
Citations in the corpus
- Mating markets and bargaining hands: Mate preferences for attractiveness and resources in two national U.S. studies (2016, background): “Traits associated with physical attractiveness may be cues of a person's health, fertility, robustness, and/or social status (e.g., Buunk et al., 2002; Frederick & Haselton, 2007; Gallup & Frederick, 2010; Gangestad & Scheyd, 2005; Sugiyama, 2005).”
- Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating (2005, background): “There have been crosscultural studies that show men possess less restrictive mate preferences than women (Buss 1989; Buunk et al. 2002) and desire multiple short-term sex partners more than women do (Schmitt et al. 2003b).”