Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital
By C. Pérez. 2003
755 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10b9924d1b6cbc817fca5196f72712d03e59de8a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- G. Semieniuk
- M. Savona
- Mariana Mazzucato
- Jean-François Mercure
- P. Newell
- Ben Caldecott
- J. Palma
- John A. Cantwell
Citations in the corpus
- Low‐carbon transition risks for finance (2020, background): “The role of finance in these technological revolutions that change the “techno-economic paradigm” is developed by Carlota Perez (2002).”
- The Revenge of the Market on the Rentiers: Why neo-liberal Reports of the end of history turned out to be premature (Updated 19 December 2011) (2009, background): “11 On the latter three, see for example Broihanne et. al. (2008); Tuckett and Taffler (2008); and Perez (2002) , respectively.”
- The de-financialization of housing: towards a research agenda (2020, background): “Some scholars would nevertheless emphasize that de-financialization entails a fundamental shift towards a wage-led economy fundamentally backed by technological innovations in which finance becomes once again a ‘modest helper’ of the real economy (Perez, 2003; Sweezy, 1994).”
- The Great Depression as a Credit Boom Gone Wrong (2003, positive): “…dynamics should have been particularly apparent), mass-production consumer goods industries (where the role of financial innovation was particularly important), and high-tech industries (where authors like Perez 2002 suggest that the role of the credit boom should have been especially evident).”
- Introduction to special issue: stranded assets and the environment (2017, background): “Perez (2002) finds five such TEPs: the Industrial Revolution (1771–1829); the Age of Steam and Railways (1829–1875); the Age of Steel, Electricity, and Heavy Engineering (1875–1908); the Age of Oil, the Automobile, and Mass Production (1908–1971); and the Age of Information and Telecommunications…”
- Innovation and economic performance in services. A firm level analysis (2006, background): “A fairly large body of literature has in fact related the increasing importance of services in modern economies to the paradigmatic change brought about by the 'ICT revolution' (Freeman and Soete, 1997; Freeman and Louçâ, 2001; Perez, 2002).”
- Innovation and international business (2017, background): “The particularly pronounced trend towards a wider dispersion of innovative effort in ICT is one facet of the paradigm shift in the general conditions for innovation and growth, according to the neo-Schumpeterian perspective upon long-run techno-socio-economic change (Freeman 1987; Freeman and Perez ”
- The role of money and the financial sector in energy-economy models used for assessing climate and energy policy (2015, methodology): “Following this, work has been done on characterising the great historical waves of innovation(Freeman and Perez, 1988, Freeman and Louçã, 2001), and matching them to the structure of investment fluctuations and technology-related financial crises over history (Perez, 2001).”
- 11. Capitalism, Technology and a Green Global Golden Age: The Role of History in Helping to Shape the Future (2015, background): “31 Perez (2012) The potential for a new global positive-sum game Cheap universal ICT”
- Additive manufacturing of structural materials (2021, background): “and Boeing airplane components printed by GE Aviation, also implies that a broad review on this topic is appropriate to provide sufficient technical suggestions for the ongoing practical applications and technological revolution analysis [21].”
- From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy (2016, background): “…projects, it is only recently that considerable focus has been placed on the broader network of structures, actors, strategies and agencies, such as intelligence distributed amongst actors and institutions, flat organizational structures, flexibility, and customization (Perez 2002).”
- Critical Semiotic Analysis and Cultural Political Economy. (2004, background): “Nonetheless, with all due caution about the frailty of predictions during a transition from one long wave of capitalist development to another (Perez 2002), it does seem that the KBE has not only been ‘selected’ from among the many competing discourses about post-Fordist futures but is now being…”