Critical Semiotic Analysis and Cultural Political Economy.

462 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Towards a ‘critical cultural political economy’ account of the globalising of education (2015, unknown): “…of social scientists who have sought new ways of understanding modern social formations, their social relations and subjectivities, by bringing political economy into a productive conversation with the cultural turn (cf. Sayer 2001; Jessop 2004, 2009; Jones 2008; Sum 2008; Best and Paterson 2010).”
On academic capitalism (2018, background): “influence of the ‘knowledge-based economy’ paradigm in the transition beyond Fordism to new accumulation regimes (Jessop 2004).”
Capitalism and Urbanization in a New Key? The Cognitive-Cultural Dimension (2007, background): “Different imaginaries are possible in relation to any given social substrate and - this is the point - can be harnessed in the service of political action directed to social change (cf. Jessop 2004).”
Financialisation, Financial Literacy and Asset-Based Welfare (2009, background): “This cultural dimension to economic and financial phenomena is recognised by political economists attentive to developments in rhetorical, discursive and semiotic analysis or to ‘culturalist’ concerns more generally (see Jessop and Sum 2001; Jessop 2004; Aitken 2007, ch. 1).”