Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

By Rongwei Fu, G. Gartlehner, M. Grant, Tatyana A. Shamliyan, Art Sedrakyan, T. Wilt, L. Griffith, Mark Oremus, P. Raina, A. Ismaila and 3 more. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011

671 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/039a72be66da55235a8943b726dde04aee914080

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Health Professions

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Racism as a Determinant of Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015, methodology): “This threshold was used in prior meta-analyses, and based on minimum thresholds established in the literature [60, 61].”
Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews (2011, methodology): “Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews 182 FINDING WHAT WORKS IN HEALTH CARE variability arises from three sources—clinical diversity, methodological diversity, and statistical heterogeneity—which should be separately considered in presentation and discussion (Fu et al.,”
Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis (2018, methodology): “In order to conduct moderator analyses, and to acquire ac-ceptably robust coe ﬃ cient estimates, we followed the suggestion by Fu and colleagues and examined the e ﬀ ect of moderators only if at least 4 studies per group were available (Fu et al., 2014).”
Classroom climate and children’s academic and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, methodology): “We used moderator analyses to explain heterogeneity in the relation between classroom climate and youth outcomes (Shadish & Sweeney, 1991), but analyses were conducted only when there were at least four effect sizes per subgroup (Fu et al., 2011).”
Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. (2011, background): “[9] Fu R, Gartlehner G, Grant M, et al.”
Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, background): “However, Fu et al. (2011) contend that between 6 and 10 studies is sufficient.”
Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour (2019, background): “Effect sizes were stronger for intentions to engage in adaptive behaviour (r = .37, z = 7.53, p .01, 95% CI [.28, .45]) than for past adaptive behaviours, for which a non-significant relationship was found (r = .15, z = 1.69, p = .09, 95% CI [-.02, .31]).”
Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2018, methodology): “Disorders were included in this analysis if at least four trials employing a given comparison condition were available (Fu et al., 2011).”