Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique

By E. Stam. 2015

1,932 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/830ba1c1d00f1ce2b11bc48f54b61141ed596f3e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Towards a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems (2018, background): “As Stam (2015) argues, this leads to a situation of policy leading theory rather than theory informing policy and practice.”
Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems (2018, background): “The presence of these elements and the interaction between them predominantly determine the success of the ecosystem” (Stam, 2015, p. 1766).”
The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems (2019, background): “Any policy interventions, even in the best intention as a “feeder of an ecosystem” (Stam, 2015) or a wise dictator, could disturb a hitherto existing equilibrium path leading to adverse effects for the whole entrepreneurial ecosystem.”
Developing and governing entrepreneurial ecosystems: the structure of entrepreneurial support programs in Edinburgh, Scotland (2016, background): “Ecosystems represent the regional economic, social, and cultural environment within a region that provides support and resources for growthoriented entrepreneurs (Spigel, 2015, Stam, 2015).”
Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding? (2019, background): “2014) Entrepreneurship ecosystem theory (Stam, 2015; Stam and Spigel, 2017) , the evolution of technology transfer competencies at universities (Clarysse et al.”
Evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems: a research pathway (2021, background): “…literature, however, an entrepreneurial ecosystem is rooted in place with a relatively distinct local or regional geographic boundary within which is contained mutually dependent components (Adams, 2020; Auerswald, 2015; Brown & Mason, 2017; Mason & Brown, 2014; O’Connor et al., 2018; Stam, 2015).”
Women’s entrepreneurship policy research: a 30-year review of the evidence (2019, background): “2.1 The Policy Dimension of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems The policy dimension of the ecosystem has been recognized as a particularly powerful ecosystem component (Mason & Brown, 2014; Mazzarol, 2014; Stam, 2015), not least in the context of women’s entrepreneurship.”
The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (2017, neutral): “In the digital entrepreneurial eco-system, the goal of the ecosystem is to improve the performance of the economy (Stam 2015).”
An effectual leadership perspective for developing rural entrepreneurial ecosystems (2018, background): “First, Stam (2015) understates an important condition required for a rural entrepreneurial ecosystem to facilitate productive entrepreneurship—that of effective entrepreneurial leadership (Markley et al. 2015; McKeever et al. 2015).”
Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach (2017, background): “We follow Stam (2015), who puts forward that the entrepreneurial ecosystem is multileveled and proposed an approach building on Andersson and Henrekson (2015).”
A progress review of entrepreneurship and regional development: What are the remaining gaps? (2016, background): “Stam’s (2015) recent literature work of entrepreneurial ecosystems offers a holistic and reciprocal model of how entrepreneurship and its underlying mechanisms ultimately lead to value creation for”
Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements (2019, methodology): “Based on the ecosystem concepts and frameworks reviewed above, Stam (2015) developed ten key elements of an entrepreneurial ecosystem (see Table 1).”