Limited Field of View of Head-Mounted Displays Is Not the Cause of Distance Underestimation in Virtual Environments

By Joshua M. Knapp, Jack M. Loomis. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2004

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/106a77e9ed235ea857ceac6198f8bc70cfbeb815

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Victoria Interrante
2. Jack M. Loomis
3. B. Ries
4. E. Kruijff
5. J. Edward Swan II
6. Lee Anderson
7. W. Thompson
8. Steven K. Feiner

Citations in the corpus

• Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? (2004, background): “Limited field of view is often suggested as a cause of distorted spatial vision in HMDs, but Knapp and Loomis (in press) found that limiting FOV did not affect real-world egocentric distance judgments, at least if the observer was free to move his or her head to visually explore the environment.”
• Distance Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments, Revisited (2006, background): “in the real world [13, 3], and although Willemsen et al.”
• Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited (2010, background): “However, a limited FOV does not necessarily cause depth estimation failures (Knapp and Loomis [31]).”