The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: factor structure in a non-clinical sample
By T. Kubarych, Ian J. Deary, Elizabeth J. Austin. 2004
203 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/106751c03ffdb2e433d84958301b432e91b89937
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- J. Hooley
- S. Rosenthal
- W. Keith Campbell
- M. B. Donnellan
- Richard W. Robins
- Kali Trzesniewski
- Aaron L. Pincus
- Robert A. Ackerman
In Social Psychology
- Richard W. Robins
- Kali Trzesniewski
- M. B. Donnellan
- W. Keith Campbell
- Brittany Gentile
- J. Hooley
- S. Rosenthal
- Sara Konrath
Citations in the corpus
- Dispositional Sources of Managerial Discretion: CEO Ideology, CEO Personality, and Firm Strategies (2018, background): “Narcissism is associated with extreme self-confidence (Campbell, Goodie, and Foster, 2004; Kubarych, Deary, and Austin, 2004).”
- Narcissism at the crossroads: phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. (2008, background): “Alternatively, a more recent and more statistically rigorous confirmatory factor analysis (Kubarych et al., 2004) suggested three possible factors: power, exhibitionism, and being a special person.”
- What Does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory Really Measure? (2011, methodology): “In contrast, the canonical three-factor Kubarych et al. (2004) solution, the four-factor Emmons (1984) solution, and the seven-factor Raskin and Terry (1988) solution were not as easily identifiable.”
- Narcissism in Organizations: A Multisource Appraisal Reflects Different Perspectives (2008, result): “However, it should be noted that the factor structure of this measure has been inconsistent across studies (Kubarych et al., 2004).”
- Personality correlates of a drive for muscularity in young men (2005, methodology): “Terry, 1988). Because the NPI is a measure that has yet to reach agreed psychometric structure (see Kubarych, Deary, & Austin, 2004 ), we chose to use the total score, as others have done, in all aspects of the data analysis.”
- Comparing clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism. (2008, methodology): “... or (b) ‘‘I am not too concerned about success,’’ as well as (a) ‘‘When people compliment me I get embarrassed’’ or (b) ‘‘I know that I am a good person because everybody keeps telling me so.’’ We used the total NPI score as this is consistent with its most common usage and because there is no cl”
- Narcissism and academic dishonesty: The exhibitionism dimension and the lack of guilt (2011, background): “Kubarych et al. (2004) describe a 3-factor solution to the NPI that contains the 10-item power dimension (a = .73, M = 4.5, SD = 2.52), the 5-item exhibitionism dimension (a = .67, M = 1.52, SD = 1.38), and the 8-item special person dimension (a = .57, M = 3.05, SD = 1.65).”