Functional Networks in Emotional Moral and Nonmoral Social Judgments

By Jorge Moll, Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza, Ivanei E. Bramati, Jordan Henry Grafman. NeuroImage, 2002

480 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1042c02b698ed4bb298d490784677ae201b12554

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications (2007, background): “…responsible for the judgments, and both neuroimaging and patient studies appear to confi rm the importance of emotional areas of the brain in guiding certain aspects of our moral intuitions ( Greene et al. , 2001; Greene and Haidt, 2002; Berthoz et al. , 2002; Moll et al. , 2002; Damasio, 1994 ).”
The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love (2004, background): “, 2000), in moral judgment (Greene and Haidt, 2002; Moll et al., 2002) and during attention to one’s own emotions (Gusnard et al.”
Neuroimaging Contributions to the Understanding of Discourse Processes (2006, background): “…that is, the ability to attribute mental states to others (essentially theory of mind), understanding social concepts (Martin and Weisberg, 2003) and making moral judgments (Greene et al., 2001; Moll et al., 2002) and on this basis it has been argued to play a central role in social cognition.”
The Enigmatic temporal pole: a review of findings on social and emotional processing. (2007, background): “One study reported TP activations when subjects were asked to detect deception (Grezes et al., 2004), while another study reported TP activations when subjects were asked to make moral decisions (Moll et al., 2002b; Heekeren et al., 2003).”
The neural basis of human moral cognition (2005, background): “Functional imaging studies in healthy individuals have involved simple MORAL JUDGEMENTS”
Deciding versus Reacting: Conceptions of Moral Judgment and the Reason-Affect Debate (2007, background): “…reaction approach has made it easier to study moral judgment in a variety of settings, from the suburbs of Porto Alegre (Haidt, Koller, & Dias, 1993) to the brain scanner (Greene et al., 2001; Greene & Haidt, 2002; Greene, Nystrom, Engell, Darley, & Cohen, 2004; Moll et al., 2001, 2002a, 2002b).”
The psychology of moral reasoning (2008, background): “This sort of inconsistency has led some commentators to conclude that there is no such thing as cause and effect (Salsburg, 2001, p. 185‐ 6). Yet, causation is so deeply embedded in the meanings of words that this view is too drastic (see, e.g., Miller & Johnson-Laird, 1976 ).”
The Actor–Observer Bias and Moral Intuitions: Adding Fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong’s Fire (2008, background): “For instance, several years ago Jorge Moll and colleagues ran a series of neuroimaging studies that explored the neural substrates of moral judgments (Moll et al. 2002a; 2002b; 2005).”