The Actor–Observer Bias and Moral Intuitions: Adding Fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong’s Fire
By Thomas Nadelhoffer, Adam Feltz. 2008
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a967f22a7059684d1aa9382c53179618d74d08d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Wesley Buckwalter
- James R. Beebe
- Edouard Machery
- Fiery Cushman
- Joshua Knobe
- Stephen Stich
- Daniel A. Wilkenfeld
- Yasmina Okan
In Social Psychology
- Joshua Knobe
- Wesley Buckwalter
- James R. Beebe
- Fiery Cushman
- Yasmina Okan
- Alex Wiegmann
- Edouard Machery
- Kevin Patrick Tobia
In Sociology and Political Science
- Wesley Buckwalter
- James R. Beebe
- Edouard Machery
- Joshua Knobe
- Fiery Cushman
- Kareem Khalifa
- Daniel A. Wilkenfeld
- Yasmina Okan
Citations in the corpus
- Order effects in moral judgment (2012, background): “Framing effects like different wording or context (e.g., ordering) are typical examples of effects that are caused by factors that are commonly believed to be morally irrelevant (Kern & Chugh, 2009; Nadelhoffer & Feltz, 2008; Petrinovich & O’Neill, 1996; Tversky & Kahneman, 1981).”
- Moral intuitions: Are philosophers experts? (2013, methodology): “In the second experiment, we surveyed professional philosophers with either the Actor or Observer condition of the Trolley Case used by Nadelhoffer and Feltz (2008).”
- Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy (2018, background): “…reactions can be changed by manipulating the context and the way in which the content is presented (e.g., presenting the stimuli with or without cognitive load as in Greene et al., 2008; presenting the same vignette in a firstversus third-person framing as in Nadelhoffer & Feltz, 2008).”