The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.

By Robert J. Marzano, J. Kendall. 2006

573 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/101a1c05e4c9fa6d0e34f5045ec92c8ba35ddf39

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. M. Ruzicka
2. Wayan Widana
3. E. Napitupulu
4. Robert J. Marzano

In Information Systems and Management

1. M. Ruzicka
2. Wayan Widana
3. Robert J. Marzano

Citations in the corpus

• MATHEMATICAL UNDERSTANDING AND REPRESENTATION ABILITY OF PUBLIC JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL IN NORTH SUMATRA (2016, background): “Temuan penelitian: (1) Berdasarkan wawancara dan observasi diketahui bahwa pendekatan konvensional masih digunakan di semua kelas SMP N; Keterlibatan siswa dalam kegiatan pembelajaran sangat rendah sebagaimana dengan kemandirian belajar siswa; Sebagian besar siswa tidak mencapai prestasi penguasaan ”
• The Effect of PjBL with WBL Media and Cognitive Style on Students’ Understanding and Science-Integrated Concept Application (2020, background): “It has characteristics of implementing the understanding in the form of new information through many types of communication modality (Marzano & Kendall, 2006).”
• On dimensionless numbers (2008, background): “To name one, Bloom (1956; see also Krathwohl et al., 1964, Marzano and Kendall, 2006) is especially useful at preparing the knowledge tests for students.”
• The Art and Science of Teaching: A Comprehensive Framework for Effective Instruction (2007, background): “These formats represent different types of knowledge and have been suggested by those who have constructed taxonomies of learning (Anderson et al., 2001; Marzano & Kendall, 2007).”
• Outcome-based Education: An Outline (2020, background): “There exist several other taxonomies too (Biggs & Collis 1982; Fink, 2013; Gagné, 1985; Gagné & Biggs, 1974; Marzano & Kendall, 2001).”
• Evaluating Geography Textbook Questions from a Spatial Perspective: Using Concepts of Space, Tools of Representation, and Cognitive Processes to Evaluate Spatiality (2009, background): “There are a dozen taxonomies of thinking skills (e.g., Anderson and Krathwohl 2001; Bloom et al. 1956; Costa 2001; Gouge and Yates 2002; Marzano 2001; Moseley et al. 2005; Presseisen 2001; Quellmalz 1987; Stahl and Murphy 1981), but no one taxonomy wholly developed for spatial thinking skills…”
• HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS ASSESSMENT (HOTS) (2017, background): “Marzano and Kendall (2007) identified three dimensions of knowledge, namely: information, mental procedures, and psychomotor procedures.”