Subjective social status: reliability and predictive utility for global health

By Don Operario, Nancy E. Adler, David R. Williams. 2004

568 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ff77d1a1efc7487a4427fa1d635b7b4d0df52d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

1. Michael Marmot
2. James Nazroo
3. P. Demakakos
4. E. Breeze
5. A. Singh‐Manoux
6. Nancy E. Adler
7. Megan M. Patton-López
8. Gudela Grote

In Sociology and Political Science

1. James Nazroo

Citations in the corpus

• Socioeconomic status and health: the role of subjective social status. (2008, background): “Secondly, although there is convincing evidence that SSS is not a product of psychological bias (Adler et al., 2000; Hu et al., 2005; Operario et al., 2004; Singh-Manoux et al., 2003), future research could add to this line of research by testing the associations between SSS and health against poten”
• Does Subjective Social Status Predict Health and Change in Health Status Better Than Objective Status? (2005, background): “This study replicates other studies in demonstrating the existence of a gradient between objective (1–3) and subjective (6,11,12) measures of SES and health.”