Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State‐Theoretical Perspective

By B. Jessop. 2002

1,496 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fc4e6052134d725cb492dbfee9aeb862761eaa5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Political Science and International Relations

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

From “old school” to “farm-to-school”: Neoliberalization from the ground up (2006, background): “…political economic project, neoliberalization has involved the privatization of public resources and spaces, minimization of labor costs, reductions of public expenditures, and the elimination of regulations seen as unfriendly to business (Jessop, 2002; McCarthy and Prudham, 2004; Peck, 2004).”
Rules of Privatization: Contradictions in Neoliberal Regulation of North Pacific Fisheries (2004, background): “…or telecommunications), regional and global free trade agreements, and the structural adjustment programs of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank (for overviews of neoliberal policy, see Overbeek 1993; Peck 2001b; Brenner and Theodore 2002; Chase 2002; Jessop 2002; Peck and Tickell 2002).”
Housing Affordability and Planning in Australia: The Challenge of Policy Under Neo-liberalism (2007, background): “Jessop (1990, 1997, 2002) has argued that it is possible to identify four tendency shifts in the functioning of the state, and while his ideas have been developed with reference to regional development, there is sufficient resonance across the housing and regional fields to justify the application…”
Partnerships for Demolition: The Governance of Urban Renewal in East Germany's Shrinking Cities (2009, background): “…and that there are significant path-dependent as well as path-shaping aspects to trajectories and outcomes alike (see Brenner and Theodore, 2002; Jessop 2002; Peck and Tickell, 2002).1 While this leaves some space for the acknowledgement of different local forms and different local responses to…”
Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition: neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifunctionality (2005, background): “Under the new doxa of'competitiveness the EU increasingly pursues neoliberal policies of budgetary rectitude, financial deregulation and labour market 'flexibilization' (Rhodes and van Apeldoorn, 1997; Hay and Rosamund, 2002; Jessop, 2002b).”
A typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis (2011, background): “It has assumed importance as researchers have sought to understand how the state can best act to mediate contemporary tourism-related social, economic, political and environmental policy problems at a time when the role of the state has itself changed, given the dominance of neo-liberal policy disco”
Urban Entrepreneurship, Corporate Interests and Sports Mega-Events: The Thin Policies of Competitiveness within the Hard Outcomes of Neoliberalism (2006, background): “Neoliberalism promotes market-led economic and social restructuring which produces, among other things, a more general orientation of economic and social policy to the private sector’s ‘needs’ (Jessop, 2002).”
Standardizing sustainable development? The Forest Stewardship Council's plantation policy review process as neoliberal environmental governance. (2010, background): “…including public–private cooperation, multi-stakeholder, and/or non-governmental organizations, voluntaristic mechanisms, and reliance on the social responsibilities of rational economic individuals and ethical corporations (Jessop, 2002; Peck and Tickell, 2002; McCarthy and Prudham, 2004).”
Accumulation by Decarbonization and the Governance of Carbon Offsets (2008, background): “…of a collaborative Voluntary Carbon Standard (VCS) and its consultative process represents a form of collective governing structure that is steering the industry in a direction that is deemed to be mutually beneficial and echoes other patterns of governance under neoliberalism (Jessop 1998, 2002).”
Geographies of Neoliberalism in Latin America (2005, background): “Neoliberalism is perhaps most commonly thought of as an economic and political project that seeks to liberalize trade (particularly international trade), privatize statecontrolled industries and services, and introduce market-oriented management practices to the reduced public sector (Jessop, 2002).”