The concept of validity.
By Denny Borsboom, G. Mellenbergh, J. van Heerden. Psychology Review, 2004
1,622 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f52becba9a9dd431bc69d42bbd86f95724a84b8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Mikko Rönkkö
- Stéphane Côté
- J. Edwards
- Jelte M. Wicherts
- Agnes Moors
- J. de Houwer
- Denny Borsboom
- D. Beglar
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Robert J. Vandenberg
- Jelte M. Wicherts
- Conor V. Dolan
- J. Edwards
- G. Cizek
- Lawrence J. Williams
- Stéphane Côté
- Sacha Epskamp
Citations in the corpus
- A Psychometric Network Perspective on the Validity and Validation of Personality Trait Questionnaires (2019, background): “Validation differs from validity in that it is an ongoing activity which seeks to describe, classify, and evaluate the degree that empirical evidence and theoretical rationales support the validity of the questionnaire (Borsboom et al., 2004; Messick, 1989).”
- Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “To conclude, on the basis of the work of Borsboom and colleagues (Borsboom, 2006; Borsboom et al., 2004), we can now define a measure as a measurement outcome that is causally produced by the to-be-measured attribute.”
- Construct Validation in Social and Personality Research (2017, background): “The importance of establishing construct validity for these measures is reflected in the many resources which outline best practices (AERA et al., 2014; Borsboom & Mellenbergh, 2004).”
- Facets of visual aesthetics (2010, background): “…the adequacy of the factor structure, we evaluated the patterns of loadings and the factor intercorrelations.1 As expected, correlations between the factors were moderate to high, reflecting the notion that they represent facets of a common construct (cf., Borsboom et al., 2004; Gorsuch, 1997).”
- The role of auxiliary assumptions for the validity of manipulations and measures (2012, background): “Because it is possible for the measure to be valid in the Borsboom et al. (2004) sense but to be invalid in the sense of auxiliary validity, the contrast between these two types of validity is easy to see.”
- Construct Validity: Advances in Theory and Methodology (2009, background): “More explicit statements of theory would (a) clarify the degree to which a given empirical test truly pertains to the theory and (b) drive the development of more direct tests of theoretical mechanisms (Borsboom 2006; Borsboom et al. 2004).”