Constructions of Neoliberal Reason

By Jamie Peck. 2010

934 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0eb5904e7a2ac1dc09f01b78d7ff181da1722613

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Sociology and Political Science

In Urban Studies

Citations in the corpus

Decoupling: A Key Fantasy of the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Agenda (2017, positive): “The capacity of neoliberalism to sustain its ‘non-death’ in the face of persistent failure, both in the environmental realm and elsewhere, has provoked debate among critical analysts (Crouch, 2011; Fletcher, 2013a, 2013b, 2014; Peck, 2010; Wilson, 2014).”
Neoliberalism as discourse: between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism (2012, background): “The current influence of neoliberal reason (Peck, 2010) offers no exception to the notion that power operates as a field of knowledge serving some purpose, and through such understanding we begin to open a window to how poststructuralism might be able to accommodate the political economy appraisal…”
Probing Precarious Work: Theory, Research, and Politics (2017, background): “Perhaps the most important source of ambiguity that has inhibited research on precarious work, however, conerns the nature of neoliberalism itself (Harvey, 2005; Peck, 2010), the contours of which have remained only vaguely understood.”
Governing Global Supply Chain Sustainability through the Ethical Audit Regime (2017, background): “Yet, as part of a broader commitment to the ‘open-ended and contradictory process of politically assisted market rule’ (Peck, 2010, p. xii), most states have scaled back state-based monitoring of production practices.”
Nature™ Inc.: Changes and Continuities in Neoliberal Conservation and Market‐based Environmental Policy (2012, neutral): “This is an interesting finding, especially in relation to a recent body of literature that defines neoliberalization basically as an ‘open-ended and contradictory process of regulatory restructuring’ (Peck, 2010: 7; see also Peck and Tickell, 2002; Brenner et al., 2010).”
Neoliberalism and the geographies of marketization (2016, background): “In his work on ‘Polanyian economic geographies’, for example, Jamie Peck (2013: 1555) argues that Karl Polanyi’s notion of the economy as ‘instituted process’ was a ‘multilogical one’ providing the means for ‘understanding variegated economic formation’.”
A Monstrous Hybrid: The Political Economy of Housing in Early Twenty-first Century Sweden (2013, background): “As we know from the enormous literature on neoliberalism, not least Wacquant’s (2009) own intervention (see also Peck and Tickell 2002; Peck 2010), the phenomenon is itself always and everywhere a state project requiring more or less regulation to put in place and defend propitious conditions for…”
Explaining (with) Neoliberalism (2013, background): “There is a need for no less situated and sociological analyses of the origins, tenets, and imperatives of neoliberalism—before, ‘above’, outside, and beyond this or that ‘local’ configuration, actually existing neoliberalism, hybrid assemblage, etc.—and although COLLIER (2012, p. 194), for his part,”
Towards a ‘critical cultural political economy’ account of the globalising of education (2015, neutral): “Whilst some of these countries are recipients of Bank aid, countries such as New Zealand are not, though it has in the past been assigned the status of a laboratory for World Bank structural adjustment policies (Peck 2010).”
Constructing sustainable tourism development: The 2030 agenda and the managerial ecology of sustainable tourism (2019, background): “…from their research on sustainable cities, knowledges are not additive and so reducing them to a lingua franca, in this case market-oriented neoliberal managerialism (Knafo, Dutta, Lane, & Wyn-Jones, 2018; Lawrence, 2017; Peck, 2010), will not of itself enable a resolution to that engagement.”
Neoliberalism as concept (2015, background): “(Peck, 2010, p. 13) Following from this is a third point that, while many terminological critiques start by acknowledging that neoliberalism is already an over‐stretched and ill‐ defined signifier, the solutions they reach for along the axes of reach versus depth are either further to refine,…”
The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation (2017, background): “Yet most agree that there is something very significant to which the term is intended to point (Peck 2010; Steger and Roy 2010; McCarthy 2012), and that it is not ‘a figment of the (critical) imagination’ (Peck 2010:15).”
The Evolution and Trajectories of English Spatial Governance: ‘Neoliberal’ Episodes in Planning (2013, background): “More recently, a slightly different terminology has posited the 1970s and 1980s as ‘Disarticulated neoliberalism’ leading on to a period from the 1990s of ‘Deepening neoliberalism’ (Brenner et al. 2010, see also Peck, 2010, Chapter 1).”