Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches

By S. Hove. 2006

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services (2016, unknown): “The most important outcome of the analysis was to show that the trade-off situations and distributional impacts are real and cannot be wished, or ‘optimized’, away (see van der Hove 2006).”
Managing Legitimacy in Complex and Heterogeneous Environments: Sustainable Development in a Globalized World (2013, unknown): “Second, the approach tends to overlook the possibility that the envisioned solutions cannot always be realized: the various parties may not always reach consensus nor is it always possible to make the business case for the issue at hand (van den Hove, 2006).”
A Rationale for Science-Policy Interfaces (2007, background): “One potential way of creating such room is to ensure that science-policy interfaces are participatory, as participatory settings allow for the various and often irreconcilable values underlying problem definition and social choices to be explicitly introduced and accounted for in the scientific qual”