A Rationale for Science-Policy Interfaces

By S. Hove. 2007

431 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db524580bf3f416f3967658bf86893bc278e07a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. M. Baguette
2. I. Steffan‐Dewenter
3. Atte Moilanen
4. J. Clobert
5. S. Potts
6. Josef Settele
7. David Storch
8. M. Sykes

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Clobert
2. Laurent Excoffier

Citations in the corpus

• Securing the conservation of biodiversity across administrative levels and spatial, temporal, and ecological scales - Research needs and approaches of the SCALES project (2010, background): “A systematic sci - ence-policy dialogue is essential to catalyse these processes (Van den Hove 2007).”
• The reflective futures practitioner: Balancing salience, credibility and legitimacy in generating foresight knowledge with stakeholders (2015, neutral): “While normative framings are unavoidable (van den Hove, 2007), researchers should learn to explicitly acknowledge the political choices implicit in the policy discourses they both work within and help to establish (Wesselink, Buchanan, Georgiadou, & Turnhout, 2013).”