Adaptive Informal Institutions and Endogenous Institutional Change in China

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The interaction of entrepreneurship and institutions (2010, neutral): “The initially small productive sector of the Chinese economy began to grow year by year through successful entrepreneurial ventures (Tsai, 2006).”
The government of self-regulation: on the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility (2011, background): “…state has generally meant a more fundamental shift towards more ‘liberal’ governance systems; for example, South Korea in the post-1997 period (Kang, 2010; Pirie, 2005), but also to a smaller degree China where there has been a rise of a new generation of private entrepreneurs (Tsai, 2005, 2006).”
Mixing business with politics: Political participation by entrepreneurs in China (2015, background): “A major change in how the Chinese regime perceived the private sector was seen in 1999, when it was stated that “individual, private and other non-public economies that exist within the limits prescribed by law are major components of the socialist market economy” (Tsai, 2006).”
The role of informal institutions in corporate governance: Brazil, Russia, India, and China compared (2011, background): “There has been “institutional conversion” where actors “quietly appropriate formal institutions to serve their own ends” (Tsai, 2006) when there is a gap between the original intentions of the formal institutions and the aims of local actors.”