Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems, Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (Eds.). The book, Design at Work: Cooperative design of computer systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991, (ISBN…
By Vicki S. Napper. 1994
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Shane T. Mueller
- Robert R. Hoffman
- Gary Klein
- Gerhard G. Fischer
- Abigail Emrey
- William J. Clancey
- Bilge Mutlu
- James H. Martin
Citations in the corpus
- Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI (2019, background): “Boy (1991), Greenbaum and Kyng (1991) Concept of "cooperative design," in which users play a role in the creation of the AI systems.”
- Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories? (2002, methodology): “CSCW often turns to other methods to support the design process including: contextual enquiry (Beyer and Holtzblatt, 1998), participatory design (Greenbaum and Kyng, 1991), and user centered design (Norman and Draper, 1986).”
- Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering (2011, background): “We conclude by identifying outstanding research issues that can be used to shape the discipline of socio-technical systems engineering.”
- Living Lab: A Methodology between User‐Centred Design and Participatory Design (2014, unknown): “This process is a key characteristic of the various participatory design practices emanating from the Scandinavian research-led tradition (e.g., Greenbaum and Kyng, 1991).”
- Redesigning an "Urban" Teacher Education Program: An Activity Theory Perspective (2002, background): “Democracy in the workplace is probably much more achieved in Scandinavian countries than in North America (e.g., Ehn, 1992; Henderson & Kyng, 1991).”
- Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research (2003, background): “…under development also take part in its design and implementation, the use context will be more fully reflected in the final system, and workers' tacit knowledge about the task can be brought to bear (Greenbaum and Kyng 1991; Gutwin and Greenberg 1998; Guzdial et al. 2000; Nardi and Miller 1991).”
- A Survey of Design Rationale Systems: Approaches, Representation, Capture and Retrieval (2000, background): “Finally, builders of design rationale systems should borrow ideas from the eld of Participatory Design [116], Evolutionary Growth [117], the Improvisational model [118], and the framework speci ed in [119].”
- Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism (2001, methodology): “Authors in this AIM issue draw on Scandinavian participatory design approaches [82] and on the writings of Wino-”
- A vision for technology-mediated support for public participation & assistance in mass emergencies & disasters (2010, methodology): “Finally, engagement with emergency response practitioners, including the use of participatory design techniques (Greenbaum & Kyng, 1992), is critical here.”
- The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002-2012 (2015, methodology): “…discuss their conceptions of participation, but actually do cite some of the key publications in the field, for instance Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems (Greenbaum and Kyng, 1991a), underscoring the previous point about taking the definition of ‘participation’ for granted.”
- Instrument mediated activity: from subject development to anthropocentric design (2005, background): “Like others (Ehn 1989, Bannon 1991, Bannon and Bødker 1991, Greenbaum and Kyng 1991, Henderson 1991), it is felt that usage is an integral part of instrument design processes.”
- Designing interaction, not interfaces (2004, background): “It builds upon participatory design [18] by heavily involving end users throughout the design process.”