Hidden charged dark matter

By Jonathan L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, H. Tu, Hai-Bo Yu. 2009

430 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Can dark matter be stabilized by charge conservation, just as the electron is in the standard model? We examine the possibility that dark matter is hidden, that is, neutral under all standard model gauge interactions, but charged under an exact {\rm U}(1) gauge symmetry of the hidden sector. Such candidates are predicted in WIMPless models, supersymmetric models in which hidden dark matter has the desired thermal relic density for a wide range of masses. Hidden charged dark matter has many novel properties not shared by neutral dark matter: (1) bound state formation and Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation after chemical freeze out may reduce its relic density, (2) similar effects greatly enhance dark matter annihilation in protohalos at redshifts of z ~ 30, (3) Compton scattering off hidden photons delays kinetic decoupling, suppressing small scale structure, and (4) Rutherford scattering makes such dark matter self-interacting and collisional, potentially impacting properties of the Bullet Cluster and the observed morphology of galactic halos. We analyze all of these effects in a WIMPless model in which the hidden sector is a simplified version of the minimal supersymmetric standard model and the dark matter is a hidden sector stau. We find that charged hidden dark matter is viable and consistent with the correct relic density for reasonable model parameters and dark matter masses in the range 1 GeV  mX  10 TeV. At the same time, in the preferred range of parameters, this model predicts cores in the dark matter halos of small galaxies and other halo properties that may be within the reach of future observations. These models therefore provide a viable and well-motivated framework for collisional dark matter with Sommerfeld enhancement, with novel implications for astrophysics and dark matter searches.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e31e91870c064166d5c14384b0bbec1b4eba5a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

  1. A. Peter
  2. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  3. James S. Bullock

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. A. Peter
  2. James S. Bullock
  3. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  4. Matthew R. Buckley
  5. S. Garrison-Kimmel
  6. M. Vogelsberger
  7. Miguel Rocha
  8. T. Bringmann

Citations in the corpus