Constraining self-interacting dark matter with the Milky Way’s dwarf spheroidals

By J. Zavala, M. Vogelsberger, UW MatthewG.Walker, Pi, HarvardCfA. 2012

368 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Self-Interacting Dark Matter is an attractive alternative to the Cold Dark Matter paradigm only if it is able to substantially reduce the central densities of dwarf-size haloes while keeping the densities and shapes of cluster-size haloes within current constraints. Given the seemingly stringent nature of the latter, it was thought for nearly a decade that Self-Interacting Dark Matter would be viable only if the cross section for self-scattering was strongly velocitydependent. However, it has recently been suggested that a constant cross section per unit mass of T=m 0:1cm 2 g 1 is sufficient to accomplish the desired effect. We explicitly investigate this claim using high resolution cosmological simulations of a Milky-Way size halo and find that, similarly to the Cold Dark Matter case, such cross section produces a population of massive subhaloes that is inconsistent with the kinematics of the classical dwarf spheroidals, in particular with the inferred slopes of the mass profiles of Fornax and Sculptor. This problem is resolved if T=m 1cm 2 g 1 at the dwarf spheroidal scales. Since this value is likely inconsistent with the halo shapes of several clusters, our results leave only a small window open for a velocity-independent Self-Interacting Dark Matter model to work as a distinct alternative to Cold Dark Matter.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a2334e04729d5f67fe747fdbff7d2941b188447

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. James S. Bullock
  2. Justin I. Read
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. A. Peter
  5. M. Vogelsberger
  6. Matthew R. Buckley
  7. Volker Springel
  8. M. Boylan-Kolchin

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. A. Peter
  2. James S. Bullock
  3. Matthew R. Buckley
  4. Justin I. Read
  5. Giacomo Cacciapaglia
  6. Claudio Pica
  7. Gilles Louppe
  8. S. Garrison-Kimmel

Citations in the corpus