Computational prediction of human metabolic pathways from the complete human genome

By Pedro Romero, J. Wagg, M. Green, Dale Kaiser, Markus Krummenacker, Peter D. Karp. Genome Biology, 2004

558 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundWe present a computational pathway analysis of the human genome that assigns enzymes encoded therein to predicted metabolic pathways. Pathway assignments place genes in their larger biological context, and are a necessary first step toward quantitative modeling of metabolism.ResultsOur analysis assigns 2,709 human enzymes to 896 bioreactions; 622 of the enzymes are assigned roles in 135 predicted metabolic pathways. The predicted pathways closely match the known nutritional requirements of humans. This analysis identifies probable omissions in the human genome annotation in the form of 203 pathway holes (missing enzymes within the predicted pathways). We have identified putative genes to fill 25 of these holes. The predicted human metabolic map is described by a Pathway/Genome Database called HumanCyc, which is available at http://HumanCyc.org/. We describe the generation of HumanCyc, and present an analysis of the human metabolic map. For example, we compare the predicted human metabolic pathway complement to the pathways of Escherichia coli and Arabidopsis thaliana and identify 35 pathways that are shared among all three organisms.ConclusionsOur analysis elucidates a significant portion of the human metabolic map, and also indicates probable unidentified genes in the genome. HumanCyc provides a genome-based view of human nutrition that associates the essential dietary requirements of humans with a set of metabolic pathways whose existence is supported by the human genome. The database places many human genes in a pathway context, thereby facilitating analysis of gene expression, proteomics, and metabolomics datasets through a publicly available online tool called the Omics Viewer.

Subfields: Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0de3b348a17998b9782239ab490297fb4b8b8fc2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. David S. Wishart
  2. Bernhard O. Palsson
  3. Jianguo Xia
  4. Markus J. Herrgård
  5. Jens Nielsen
  6. Markus Krummenacker
  7. Peter D. Karp
  8. Intawat Nookaew

Citations in the corpus