Decision-making and addiction (part I): impaired activation of somatic states in substance dependent individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences.

By Antoine Bechara, Hanna Damasio. Neuropsychologia, 2002

875 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0da2539425196a07ece11a0e4b01e414d9a0ed1b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The somatic marker hypothesis: a critical evaluation. (2006, background): “…findings of elevated anticipatory SCRs to the disadvantageous decks, relative to the advantageous decks (for example, Bechara et al., 1999, 2002; Bechara and Damasio, 2002; Campbell et al., 2004; Jameson et al., 2004; Hinson et al., 2002; Tomb et al., 2002; Suzuki et al., 2003; Crone et al.,…”
The Effect of an Impulsive Personality on Overeating and Obesity: Current State of Affairs (2008, background): “It other words, the most sensible choice in the long run is to select cards from decks C and D (Bechara & Damasio, 2002).”
The addicted human brain: insights from imaging studies. (2003, background): “Thus, one might expect that the disruptions of self-monitoring and decision-making processes that are observed in drugaddicted subjects (47, 48) are in part related to disrupted prefrontal functions.”
Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. (2008, methodology): “On measures of cognitive impulsivity, opiate users showed reduced reflection and higher error rates (Clark et al., 2006; Lee and Pau, 2002), and impaired performance on measures of decisionmaking including the Iowa Gambling Test (IGT) (Mintzer et al., 2005; Mintzer and Stitzer, 2002; Petry et al., 1”
Neurocognitive Effects of Methamphetamine: A Critical Review and Meta-analysis (2007, background): “Of additional interest is the possible link between cognitive impairment and poor treatment outcomes in MA users, again, especially in terms of executive and memory deficits, which are theorized contributors to the maintenance of drug-seeking behaviors (Bechara and Damasio 2002).”
The reasoning skills and thinking dispositions of problem gamblers: a dual‐process taxonomy (2007, result): “Thus, in a manner similar to other studies (Bechara & Damasio, 2002; Bechara, Dolan, & Hindes, 2002), we compared the number of individuals in each group using this impairment criterion.”
The insula and drug addiction: an interoceptive view of pleasure, urges, and decision-making (2010, background): “Of note, gambling does not provide the same kind of direct bodily stimulation that drug taking and naturally motivated behaviors provide [though it is known that winning and losing money under conditions of risk and uncertainty does elicit autonomic responses (Bechara et al. 1997; Bechara and Damasi”
Decision-making and addiction (part II): myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? (2002, methodology): “shows reward SCR from normal, SDI, and VM groups generated during their performance of the variant A. Bechara et al. / Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 1690–1705 1695 Fig.”
Neural correlates of voluntary and involuntary risk taking in the human brain: An fMRI Study of the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART) (2008, background): “Although some amount of risk-taking behaviour is desirable and essential for human survival and advancement, excessive risktakingmay underlie pathological conditions such as drug-abuse and compulsive gambling (Bechara and Damasio, 2002; Weintraub and Potenza, 2006).”
Prospection and the Present Moment: The Role of Episodic Foresight in Intertemporal Choices between Immediate and Delayed Rewards (2016, background): “This is particularly the case in some highly substance-dependent individuals, who have been shown to heavily underweight potential future consequences (Bechara, 2005; Bechara & Damasio, 2002; Petry, Bickel, & Arnett, 1998).”
ΔFosB Induction in Orbitofrontal Cortex Mediates Tolerance to Cocaine-Induced Cognitive Dysfunction (2007, background): “One interpretation of these data are that individuals persist in choosing the larger reward, disregarding the adverse consequence of delay, a concept termed “myopia for the future” (Bechara and Damasio, 2002).”
Probing the link between narcissism and gambling: the mediating role of judgment and decision‐making biases (2008, background): “…focus on reward among individuals demonstrating heightened propensities for risky behaviors, such as those with substance addiction disorders (e.g., Bechara & Damasio, 2002), HIV patients who contracted the disease through intravenous drug use or risky sexual behaviors (e.g., Hardy, Hinkin,…”