Cognitive neuropsychology and aphasia therapy: the case of word retrieval

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A cognitive neuropsychological approach to assessment and intervention in aphasia: A clinician's guide (2005, background): “To date, a few studies that have adopted this kind of approach (see, for example, Hickin et al., 2002; Hillis & Caramazza, 1994; Howard, 2000; Springer, Glindemann, Huber, & Willmes, 1991) have shown that this can be productive.”
Improving word finding: Practice makes (closer to) perfect? (2002, background): “Proportion correct in spoken naming of Nickels and Howard (1994) picture set”
Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing (2002, background): “Both Nickels (2002) and Howard (2000) argue for the same mechanism: many aphasic individuals are inconsistent in their naming ability—some names will be successfully retrieved on one occasion but not on another.”
Phonological therapy for word-finding difficulties: A re-evaluation (2002, background): “When they went on to compare these two tasks in a treatment study, the differences in the effects of the two types of task were minimal (Howard, 2000; Howard et al., 1985b).”
Distinguishing semantic and lexical word retrieval deficits in people with aphasia (2006, background): “The sets used were matched for all the remaining variables with one exception: the sets varying word length necessarily differ in both the number of syllables and the number of phonemes (see Howard & Nickels, 2005, for the difficulties of separating these effects).”