Goals and plans in decision making

By David H. Krantz, Howard Kunreuther. Judgment and Decision Making, 2007

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We propose a constructed-choice model for general decision making. The model departs from utility theory and prospect theory in its treatment of multiple goals and it suggests several different ways in which context can affect choice.It is particularly instructive to apply this model to protective decisions, which are often puzzling. Among other anomalies, people insure against non-catastrophic events, underinsure against catastrophic risks, and allow extraneous factors to influence insurance purchases and other protective decisions. Neither expected-utility theory nor prospect theory can explain these anomalies satisfactorily. To apply this model to the above anomalies, we consider many different insurance-related goals, organized in a taxonomy, and we consider the effects of context on goals, resources, plans and decision rules.The paper concludes by suggesting some prescriptions for improving individual decision making with respect to protective measures.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d69baab3f17b53adf8c183c401077be5843eaa8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

  1. R. Gifford
  2. Stijn M. J. van Osselaer
  3. S. Clayton
  4. Cindy Dietrich
  5. Janet K. Swim
  6. T. Doherty
  7. Chris Janiszewski

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. R. Gifford
  2. Stijn M. J. van Osselaer
  3. S. Clayton
  4. Cindy Dietrich
  5. Janet K. Swim
  6. T. Doherty

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. S. Clayton
  2. T. Doherty
  3. R. Gifford
  4. Janet K. Swim
  5. Stijn M. J. van Osselaer
  6. Cindy Dietrich
  7. Chris Janiszewski
  8. M. Lewicka

Citations in the corpus