The K20 survey - III. Photometric and spectroscopic properties of the sample

By A. Cimatti, M. Mignoli, E. Daddi, L. Pozzetti, A. Fontana, P. Saracco, F. Poli, A. Renzini, G. Zamorani, T. Broadhurst and 5 more. 2002

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The K20 survey is an ESO VLT optical and near-infrared spectroscopic survey aimed at obtaining spectral infor- mation and redshifts of a complete sample of about 550 objects to Ks 20:0 over two independent fields with a total area of 52 arcmin 2 . In this paper we discuss the scientific motivation of such a survey, we describe the photometric and spectroscopic properties of the sample, and we release the Ks-band photometric catalog. Extensive simulations showed that the sample is photometrically highly complete to Ks= 20. The observed galaxy counts and the R Ks color distribution are consistent with literature results. We observed spectroscopically 94% of the sample, reaching a spectroscopic redshift identification complete- ness of 92% to Ks 20:0 for the observed targets, and of 87% for the whole sample (i.e. counting also the unobserved targets). Deep spectroscopy was complemented with multi-band deep imaging in order to derive tested and reliable photometric red- shifts for the galaxies lacking spectroscopic redshifts. The results show a very good agreement between the spectroscopic and the photometric redshifts with = 0:01 and with a dispersion ofz= 0:09. Using both the spectroscopic and the photometric redshifts, we reached an overall redshift completeness of about 98%. The size of the sample, the redshift complete- ness, the availability of high quality photometric redshifts and multicolor spectral energy distributions make the K20 survey database one of the most complete samples available to date for constraining the currently competing scenarios of galaxy formation and for a variety of other galaxy evolution studies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d5b53d4fc9bc4382c47bf0c0051363bdf9e6d5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. P. V. van Dokkum
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. M. Franx
  5. Christopher J. Conselice
  6. C. Conroy
  7. R. Somerville
  8. D. M. Alexander

In Instrumentation

  1. P. V. van Dokkum
  2. M. Franx
  3. Christopher J. Conselice
  4. C. Conroy
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. L. Hernquist
  7. A. Renzini
  8. I. Labbé

Citations in the corpus