Reputation costs: the impetus for voluntary derivative financial instrument reporting
By K. Chalmers, Jayne M. Godfrey. 2004
214 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d0618be8c6a29f225071e3d18d891946f805fff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- K. Hussainey
- Mostafa Hassan
- Sherif El-Halaby
- R. Craig
- L. L. Rodrigues
- J. Oliveira
- P. Lopes
- J. Bischof
In Management Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- The Effects of IFRS 7 Adoption on Bank Disclosure in Europe (2009, background): “In the 1990s, at least some substantial improvements were observed in terms of transparency in the USA (Edwards and Eller, 1995, 1996) and Australia (Chalmers and Godfrey, 2004).”
- UAE corporations‐specific characteristics and level of risk disclosure (2009, result): “This index coincides with other studies that quantify the extent of compliance with a single, or a group, of standard(s) ( Chalmers and Godfrey, 2004”
- What’s My Style? The Influence of Top Managers on Voluntary Corporate Financial Disclosure (2010, unknown): “Legitimacy constraints are particularly limiting, s managers conform to external expectations of rationality by imitating other managers, increasng homogeneity e.g., Spender 1989; Hambrick et al. 1993; Chalmers and Godfrey 2004 .”
- Accounting for financial instruments: An analysis of the determinants of disclosure in the Portuguese stock exchange☆ (2007, background): “Auditor type Chalmers and Godfrey (2004) argue that, to maintain their reputation and avoid reputation costs, high profile auditing companies are more likely to demand high levels of disclosure.”
- Does brand management of corporate reputation translate into higher market value? (2010, unknown): “Chalmers and Godfrey (2004) find that discretionary reporting, with regard to derivatives, is positively related to the magnitude of reputation costs confronting managers and firms.”
- Determinants of compliance with AAOIFI standards by Islamic banks (2016, background): “Chalmers and Godfrey (2004) stated that to maintain their reputation and avoid reputation costs, high-profile auditing companies are more likely to demand high levels of disclosure.”
- Risk‐related disclosures by non‐finance companies: Portuguese practices and disclosure characteristics (2011, background): “These larger and well-known auditing firms tend to encourage companies to disclose more information to maintain the audit firms' reputation and avoid reputational costs to them ( Chalmers and Godfrey, 2004”