Endogenous microRNA sponges: evidence and controversy

By Daniel W. Thomson, Marcel E. Dinger. Nature reviews genetics, 2016

1,905 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) hypothesis proposes that transcripts with shared microRNA (miRNA) binding sites compete for post-transcriptional control. This hypothesis has gained substantial attention as a unifying function for long non-coding RNAs, pseudogene transcripts and circular RNAs, as well as an alternative function for messenger RNAs. Empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis is accumulating but not without attracting scepticism. Recent studies that model transcriptome-wide binding-site abundance suggest that physiological changes in expression of most individual transcripts will not compromise miRNA activity. In this Review, we critically evaluate the evidence for and against the ceRNA hypothesis to assess the impact of endogenous miRNA-sponge interactions.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0cd20a63a8ef7a8a1a36e8385834eedae66348c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cancer Research

  1. Matthew Meyerson
  2. Gad Getz
  3. Peter W. Laird
  4. Iain M. Dykes
  5. S. Baylin
  6. Jichun Yang
  7. E. Gibb
  8. Costanza Emanueli

In Molecular Biology

  1. Peter W. Laird
  2. S. Baylin
  3. Gad Getz
  4. Matthew Meyerson
  5. Yiling Lu
  6. Benilton S. Carvalho
  7. John N. Weinstein
  8. Inanç Birol

Citations in the corpus