When hearing the bark helps to identify the dog: semantically-congruent sounds modulate the identification of masked pictures.

By Yi-Chuan Chen, Charles Spence. 2010

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Yi-Chuan Chen
2. Charles Spence
3. Mirjam Keetels
4. Jean H. M. Vroomen
5. Christof Koch
6. Liad Mudrik
7. Nathan Faivre
8. Dhruv Grewal

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Yi-Chuan Chen
2. Charles Spence
3. Mirjam Keetels
4. Jean H. M. Vroomen
5. Anne L. Roggeveen
6. Dhruv Grewal
7. Nancy M. Puccinelli
8. Christof Koch

In Sensory Systems

1. Yi-Chuan Chen
2. Mirjam Keetels
3. Jean H. M. Vroomen
4. Charles Spence
5. Dhruv Grewal
6. Nancy M. Puccinelli
7. Anne L. Roggeveen
8. Christof Koch

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “In addition, semantic congruency effects can be explained by memory consolidation whenever the auditory stimulus is presented some few hundreds of ms after the visual stimulus (Chen and Spence, 2010).”
• The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain. (2011, unknown): “Whereas integration of semantically congruent cross-modal stimuli speeds up object detection and recognition, crossmodal conflicts impair performance (Chen and Spence 2010).”
• Multisensory Integration in Complete Unawareness (2014, background): “Despite such variability, subjective percepts are not experienced as sums of independent features but as integrated multimodal experiences.”
• No effect of synesthetic congruency on temporal ventriloquism (2010, background): “Other examples of semantic congruency are those between letters and speech sounds (van Atteveldt, Formisano, Goebel, & Blomert, 2004), images and sounds of common objects (Chen & Spence, 2010; Noppeney, Josephs, Hocking, Price, & Friston, 2008), and speaker identities (Noppeney et al., 2008).”
• Store Atmospherics: A Multisensory Perspective (2014, background): “In the neuroscience laboratory, incongruence is often elicited by presenting stimuli from different locations, at slightly different times, or else to present stimuli that refer to different semantic concepts (e.g., Chen & Spence, 2010, 2011, 2013).”