Chapter 17 Contingent Valuation

By Richard T. Carson, William Michael Hanemann. 2005

331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c17ef1d78cc8408a42e5ffd19a788eb6de1598d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Petr Mariel
2. J. Kenter
3. David Hoyos
4. I. Fazey
5. M. Reed
6. K. Irvine
7. Fraser McLeay
8. Chrysostomos Apostolidis

In General Decision Sciences

1. J. Kenter
2. David Hoyos
3. Petr Mariel

Citations in the corpus

• CONTINGENT VALUATION: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE (2010, methodology): “These answers are usually dropped from the data but some authors argue that given the context-specifi c nature of the CV survey these respondents would more probably vote against the proposed policy and they are better treated as “no” responses (Carson and Hanemann, 2005).”
• Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services (2016, background): “Stated preference approaches (contingent valuation and choice experiments [CEs]) have been recognised as flexible tools for valuing non-marketed ecosystem services, with their ability to assess a very broad range of goods (Carson and Hanemann, 2005).”
• Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science (2008, neutral): “In environmental economics, stated preference data is useful for analysis of policies leading to changes in behavior (Phaneuf and Smith, 2005) as well as policies that may not lead to changes in behavior (Carson and Hanemann, 2005).”