The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domains: a systematic review.

By C. Dunn, L. DeRoo, Frederick P. Rivara. Addiction, 2001

957 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Epidemiology, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c09ad53fe4a62c5495c93923c4283dc271392bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Richard M. Ryan
2. D. Markland
3. V. Tobin
4. W. Miller
5. R. K. Martins
6. D. McNeil
7. Brian L. Burke
8. Marisa Menchola

In Epidemiology

1. W. Miller
2. R. K. Martins
3. D. McNeil
4. T. Moyers
5. S. Rollnick
6. Eirini Vasilaki
7. W. Cox
8. Richard M. Ryan

In Physiology

1. R. K. Martins
2. Eirini Vasilaki
3. W. Cox
4. D. McNeil
5. Steven G. Hosier

Citations in the corpus

• The efficacy of motivational interviewing as a brief intervention for excessive drinking: a meta-analytic review. (2006, methodology): “Second, Dunn et al. (2001) reviewed 29 randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of MI across four behavioural domains: substance-abuse, smoking, HIV risk-taking, and diet/exercise.”
• A randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing. (2004, background): “Its clinical procedures are well specified (Miller & Rollnick, 1991, 2002; Miller, Zweben, DiClemente, & Rychtarik, 1992), and there is reasonable evidence that MI is an efficacious treatment for substance use disorders (Burke, Arkowitz, & Dunn, 2002; Dunn, DeRoo, & Rivara, 2001; Noonan & Moyers, ”
• Review of Motivational Interviewing in promoting health behaviors. (2009, positive): “Brief MI interventions in the areas of substance abuse, smoking, HIV risk behaviors, and diet and exercise were reviewed by Dunn, DeRoo, and Rivara (2001).”
• Motivational Interviewing and Self–Determination Theory (2005, background): “Systematic reviews of the efficacy of motivational interviewing and AMIs (Burke, Arkowitz, & Dunn, 2002; Dunn, DeRoo, & Rivara, 2001; Noonan & Moyers, 1997; Resnicow et al., 2002) have concluded that, despite methodological problems in many of the studies, the literature provides converging eviden”
• The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. (2003, background): “Dunn, DeRoo, and Rivara (2001) performed a systematic review of 29 randomized trials of brief interventions that claimed to use the principles and techniques of motivational interviewing (or what we have called AMIs) to change behavior in four areas: (a) substance abuse, (b) smoking, (c) HIV-risk…”