The organization of the forelimb representation of the C57BL/6 mouse motor cortex as defined by intracortical microstimulation and cytoarchitecture.

By Kelly A. Tennant, D. Adkins, Nicole A. Donlan, Aaron L. Asay, Nagheme J. Thomas, J. Kleim, Theresa A. Jones. 2011

393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Precision of Discrete and Rhythmic Forelimb Movements Requires a Distinct Neuronal Subpopulation in the Interposed Anterior Nucleus. (2018, methodology): “, 2009, 2011), we injected cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) conjugated with fluorophore-555 into the caudal forelimb area (CFA) of the M1 region (Figures 4K and 4L) (Tennant et al., 2011).”
Noninvasive deep brain stimulation via temporally interfering electric fields (2017, positive): “…cortex region associated with a movement of the contralateral forepaw and a current I 2 via a second electrode that was positioned on the contralateral skull, above the motor cortex region associated with movement of the whiskers ipsilateral to the I 1 electrode (Figure 5A) (Tennant et al., 2011).”
Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Functional Clusters of Neurons in the Mouse Motor Cortex during a Voluntary Movement (2013, methodology): “These motor forelimb areas that we determined by OSM corresponded to the areas that we determined by ICMS (Fig.”
elife.elifesciences.org RESEARCH ARTICLE Convergence of pontine and (2013, neutral): “EGFP-labeled neurons were restricted to lateral agranular cortex, consistent with M1 identity (Figure 6B) (Tennant et al., 2011).”