A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems.
By Chris J. Kennedy, E. Lonsdorf, M. Neel, N. Williams, Taylor H. Ricketts, R. Winfree, R. Bommarco, Claire A. Brittain, Alana L. Burley, Daniel P. Cariveau and 31 more. Ecology Letters, 2013
1,156 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0bbceabd09ab3dc67a21ae1caa5a90c93073b5b0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- C. Kremen
- T. Tscharntke
- N. Williams
- Alexandra-Maria Klein
- R. Winfree
- S. Potts
- R. Isaacs
- I. Steffan‐Dewenter
In Genetics
- C. Kremen
- T. Tscharntke
- N. Williams
- Alexandra-Maria Klein
- R. Winfree
- I. Steffan‐Dewenter
- S. Potts
- M. Aizen
In Insect Science
- C. Kremen
- T. Tscharntke
- R. Isaacs
- N. Williams
- R. Winfree
- Alexandra-Maria Klein
- S. Potts
- I. Steffan‐Dewenter
Citations in the corpus
- REVIEW: Do polycultures promote win‐wins or trade‐offs in agricultural ecosystem services? A meta‐analysis (2014, background): “For example, although there is evidence that increasing crop diversity can enhance pollination (Holzschuh et al. 2006; Kennedy et al. 2013), soil fertility (M€ader et al.”
- Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being (2016, neutral): “include organic farming practices 49,54,55 and planting flower strips that provide floral resources 56 .”
- Relationships between wild bees, hoverflies and pollination success in apple orchards with different landscape contexts (2016, background): “Several former studies showed negative or positive effects of habitat quantity and quality of the surroundings (Banaszak, 1992; Kleijn & van Langevelde, 2006; Kennedy et al., 2013; Shackelford et al., 2013; but see also Steffan-Dewenter et al., 2002; Westphal et al., 2003).”
- Grazing alters insect visitation networks and plant mating systems (2014, neutral): “As central location foragers, social bees can be sensitive to the distribution of nesting and forage habitats in the landscape surrounding the nest, although this depends on species identity and the extent of landscape simplification (Williams et al. 2010; Carvell et al. 2012; Kennedy et al. 2013).”
- Local habitat characteristics but not landscape urbanization drive pollinator visitation and native plant pollination in forest remnants (2013, background): “Light level at flowers is known to affect bee visitation (Kilkenny and Galloway, 2008), and is especially relevant for small species, which seek bright spots within forests (Herrera, 1995).”
- Anthropogenic disturbance of tropical forests threatens pollination services to acai palm in the Amazon river delta (2018, background): “, 2007), high forest cover and the presence of other tree species in floodplains probably ensured both greater “spill- over” from unmanaged areas (Kennedy et al., 2013) and higher densities of stingless bees nesting within farms compared to upland farms.”
- Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review (2016, background): “They also encourage social learning, thereby promoting salience of the DSS (Jordan et al. 2011).”